Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittenbaum, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stasser, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1, 21-34 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430298011003

The Reevaluation of Information during Group Discussion

Gwen M. Wittenbaum

Department of Communication, Michigan State University, gwittenb{at}pilot.msu.edu

Garold Stasser

Department of Psychology, Miami University

Communication in small groups often yields uniform judgments among members, particularly when members are similar to one another. This investigation empirically tested whether group discussion leads members' evaluations of information to become more uniform, particularly in groups composed of similar members. Group members evaluated the desirability of positions held by three candidates for student body president before and after discussing the candidates in three-person groups. Results showed that the disparity in evaluations within groups decreased from pre- to post discussion for candidate positions discussed, but not for positions omitted from discussion. This effect was stronger when members were told before discussion that they were similar. These results suggest that Festinger's (1950, 1954) propositions regarding (a) pressures toward uniformity of opinion in groups and (b) greater uniformity in similar groups, also hold for members' evaluation of information related to objects of judgment in addition to judgments of the objects.

Key Words: group discussion • social comparison • social influence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. D. Henningsen and M. L. M. Henningsen
Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts
Small Group Research, August 1, 2003; 34(4): 391 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
T. Reimer
Attributions for Poor Group Performance as a Predictor of Perspective-Taking and Subsequent Group Achievement: A Process Model
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2001; 4(1): 31 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]