| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207071343 © 2007 SAGE Publications Explanation and Intergroup Emotion: Social Explanations as a Foundation of Prejudice-Related CompunctionLehigh University, m.gill{at}lehigh.edu
Lehigh University Two studies examined whether social explanationscausal frameworks used to make sense of a groups status and behaviorare associated with prejudice-related compunction. In Study 1, based on Devine, Monteith, Zuwerink, & Elliott, (1991), participants who endorsed external explanations (e.g. low socioeconomic status of Blacks stems from historical maltreatment) showed a particularly strong tendency to experience compunction in response to prejudice-related discrepancies. Study 2 involved a novel paradigm. Participants were induced to admit that they would discriminate against Black males. Conceptually replicating Study 1, endorsement of external explanations was positively associated with compunction in response to this imagined discrimination. Across both studies, there was also evidence that the effects of external explanations are not explicable in terms of internal motivation to avoid prejudice, global prejudice, or global positive evaluation of African Americans. Discussion centers on the importance of explanations in shaping intergroup emotions and how the concept of explanation links the intergroup emotion literature to other emotion literatures.
Key Words: prejudice-related compunction social explanations
|
