| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/1368430299021002 Defensive Reactions to Group-Relevant InformationMiami University, Ohio, uhlerbd{at}muohio.edu The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that possession of a strong social identity would motivate people to arrive at a conclusion which supported their previous beliefs when responding to information that threatened their group. In a pre-measure, participants were classified as either weak or strong in social identity. After reading a threatening or non-threatening (fictitious) report about their group, participants were asked to evaluate the report. The results showed that participants with a strong social identity evaluated the threatening information more negatively than those with a weak social identity. Participants who had a strong social identity evaluated the non-threatening information more positively than those with a weak social identity. These results are discussed in the context of motivated reasoning and social identity theory.
Key Words: social identity threat
|