Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crisp, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hewstone, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 2, No. 4, 307-333 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430299024001
© 1999 SAGE Publications

Differential Evaluation of Crossed Category Groups: Patterns, Processes, and Reducing Intergroup Bias

Richard J. Crisp

University of Birmingham

Miles Hewstone

University of Cardiff

Previous meta-analytic reviews of the literature on crossed categorization have uncovered a number of important findings; however, several questions remain unanswered and may best be tackled using a more traditional narrative approach. This review of the literature on crossed categorization divides studies into those that are relevant to (a) which pattern of evaluation prevails in multiple categorization contexts, (b) what processes best account for the effects, and (c) whether crossed categorization can reduce intergroup bias relative to simple categorization. Re-examination of existing theory and available evidence suggests a number of important new issues to consider in studying multiple categorization.

Key Words: crossed categorization • intergroup bias


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. M. Garcia and D. T. Miller
Social Categories and Group Preference Disputes: The Aversion to Winner-Take-All Solutions
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 581 - 593.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychology Developing SocietiesHome page
R. Singh and H. Y. Goh
Gender and Group versus Individual Target as Moderators of the Models of Crossed Categorisation Effects
Psychology Developing Societies, November 1, 2006; 18(2): 139 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. E. S. Rosenthal and R. J. Crisp
Reducing Stereotype Threat by Blurring Intergroup Boundaries
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2006; 32(4): 501 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. R. Hall and R. J. Crisp
Considering Multiple Criteria for Social Categorization Can Reduce Intergroup Bias
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2005; 31(10): 1435 - 1444.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. J. Crisp and S. R. Beck
Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Moderating Role of Ingroup Identification
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2005; 8(2): 173 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. A. Nier, S. L. Gaertner, J. F. Dovidio, B. S. Banker, C. M. Ward, and M. C. Rust
Changing Interracial Evaluations and Behavior: The Effects of a Common Group Identity
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2001; 4(4): 299 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]