Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tindale, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kameda, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 3, No. 2, 123-140 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430200003002002

‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups

R. Scott Tindale

Loyola University Chicago, rtindal{at}luc.edu

Tatsuya Kameda

Hokkaido University

Although much of the research on small groups in social psychology has emphasized cognitive, information-processing tasks (decision-making and problem solving), only recently have groups been conceptualized as information-processing systems. Partially due to this new conceptualization, group research is on the rise, yet much of this research is discipline specific. Few attempts have been made to integrate this research to provide common themes or frameworks across disciplinary boundaries. We propose that one potential unifying theme underlying much of the recent research on groups is ‘social sharedness’: the degree to which cognitions, preferences, identities, etc. are shared and are being shared within groups. Through a targeted review of the literature, we attempt to demonstrate that social sharedness is central to understanding group decision-making, provides a tie between past and current group research, and can serve a unifying function for future endeavors.

Key Words: cognition • consensus • group performance • social influence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
L. M. Van Swol
Perceived Importance of Information: The Effects of Mentioning Information, Shared Information Bias, Ownership Bias, Reiteration, and Confirmation Bias
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 239 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Informatics JournalHome page
M. Ginman, S. Ek, K. Eriksson-Backa, M. Mustonen, S. Torkkola, K. Tuominen, and M. Wikgren
Health Communication and Knowledge Construction
Health Informatics Journal, December 1, 2003; 9(4): 301 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
M. C. Thomas-Hunt, T. Y. Ogden, and M. A. Neale
Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups
Management Science, April 1, 2003; 49(4): 464 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]