Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Burr, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 3, No. 3, 296-316 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430200033005

Collective Efficacy and Aspects of Shared Mental Models as Predictors of Performance Over Time in Work Groups

Erika Peterson

George Washington University

Terence R. Mitchell

University of Washington, trm{at}u.washington.edu

Leigh Thompson

Northwestern University

Renu Burr

University of Western Australia

We assessed collective efficacy (a group's judgment of their ability to perform a particular task) and some dimensions of shared mental models (models of the group structure, process and the task, that members hold in common) in student groups working on semester-long research projects. In particular, we assessed the extent to which group members had agreement and accuracy about members' past and future contributions to the group project, and agreement about the importance of various task aspects. Groups with higher efficacy early in the semester had more agreement and accuracy later in the semester. However, the reverse was not true; the extent to which agreement and accuracy developed early in the semester was not correlated with collective efficacy later in the semester. Also, groups with higher collective efficacy (as measured early and late in the semester) and more shared mental models (as measured late in the semester) received higher grades on their projects. A number of task process and social process variables were tested as possible mediators of these relationships; however, no significant mediators were found.

Key Words: efficacy • groups • mental models • performance


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
S. T. Solansky
Leadership Style and Team Processes in Self-Managed Teams
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, May 1, 2008; 14(4): 332 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
Hee Sun Park
The Effects of Shared Cognition on Group Satisfaction and Performance: Politeness and Efficiency in Group Interaction
Communication Research, February 1, 2008; 35(1): 88 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
H. E. Peelle III
Appreciative Inquiry and Creative Problem Solving in Cross-Functional Teams
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2006; 42(4): 447 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
J. W. Whiteoak, L. Chalip, and L. K. Hort
Assessing Group Efficacy: Comparing Three Methods of Measurement
Small Group Research, April 1, 2004; 35(2): 158 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
D. Oliver and J. Roos
Dealing with the Unexpected: Critical Incidents in the LEGO Mindstorms team
Human Relations, September 1, 2003; 56(9): 1057 - 1082.
[Abstract] [PDF]