This Article Full Text (PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blanton, H. Articles by Crocker, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Contexts of System Justification and System Evaluation: Exploring the Social Comparison Strategies of the (Not Yet) Contented Female Worker

University at Albany, State University of New York, hblanton{at}csc.albany.edu

Greg George

University at Albany, State University of New York

Jennifer Crocker

University of Michigan

Those who are historic targets of discrimination seem surprisingly likely to accept their situation, a phenomenon Jost and Banaji (1994) call system justification. One assumption in system justification theory, however, is that the need to justify builds over time as individuals develop an investment in the system they have implicitly helped to perpetuate. This possibility was tested as it relates to social comparison of pay. An experimental study involving 100 participants (50 men and 50 women) found that women made intragroup comparisons with other women to gauge their satisfaction with a pay rate when it was framed as compensation for past work but they made intergroup comparisons with men to gauge their satisfaction with a pay rate when it was framed as part of an offer for future employment.

Key Words: depressed entitlement • discrimination • equity • social comparison • system justification

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?