Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paladino, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Demoulin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 5, No. 2, 105-117 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430202005002539

Differential Association of Uniquely and Non Uniquely Human Emotions with the Ingroup and the Outgroup

Maria-Paola Paladino

University of Trento

Jacques-Philippe Leyens

Catholic University of Louvain, at Louvain-La-Neuve, jacques-philippe.leyens{at}psp.ucl.ac.be

Ramon Rodriguez

University of La Laguna, Tenerife

Armando Rodriguez

University of La Laguna, Tenerife

Ruth Gaunt

Catholic University of Louvain, at Louvain-La-Neuve

Stéphanie Demoulin

Catholic University of Louvain, at Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research

According to Leyens et al.’s (2000) theory, intergroup discrimination involves a differential appraisal of the ingroup’s and the outgroup’s uniquely human characteristics. Four experiments investigated how emotions that are considered uniquely (i.e. secondary emotions) and non uniquely (i.e. primary emotions) human (Demoulin et al., 2001a) are differentially associated with the ingroup and the outgroup. Using the Implicit Association Task (IAT) we found a stronger association of ingroup names with uniquely human emotions and of outgroup names with non uniquely human emotions, than the reverse. Whereas Study 2 used negative emotions, all other experiments used positive emotions. In Study 3, two IAT indices were collected: an emotional index and a standard evaluative one. While the outgroup was constituted by North African names in the first three studies, Study 4 staged French-speaking Belgians (i.e. the ingroup) versus Dutch-speaking Belgians (i.e. the outgroup). The results are discussed within the framework of psychological essentialism, according to which uniquely human characteristics form the essence of the ingroup.

Key Words: emotions • essentialism • implicit association task (IAT) • infra-humanization • prejudice


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
A. J. C. Cuddy, M. S. Rock, and M. I. Norton
Aid in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of Secondary Emotions and Intergroup Helping
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2007; 10(1): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]