| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/1368430202005002539 Differential Association of Uniquely and Non Uniquely Human Emotions with the Ingroup and the OutgroupUniversity of Trento
Catholic University of Louvain, at Louvain-La-Neuve, jacques-philippe.leyens{at}psp.ucl.ac.be
University of La Laguna, Tenerife
University of La Laguna, Tenerife
Catholic University of Louvain, at Louvain-La-Neuve
Catholic University of Louvain, at Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research According to Leyens et al.s (2000) theory, intergroup discrimination involves a differential appraisal of the ingroups and the outgroups uniquely human characteristics. Four experiments investigated how emotions that are considered uniquely (i.e. secondary emotions) and non uniquely (i.e. primary emotions) human (Demoulin et al., 2001a) are differentially associated with the ingroup and the outgroup. Using the Implicit Association Task (IAT) we found a stronger association of ingroup names with uniquely human emotions and of outgroup names with non uniquely human emotions, than the reverse. Whereas Study 2 used negative emotions, all other experiments used positive emotions. In Study 3, two IAT indices were collected: an emotional index and a standard evaluative one. While the outgroup was constituted by North African names in the first three studies, Study 4 staged French-speaking Belgians (i.e. the ingroup) versus Dutch-speaking Belgians (i.e. the outgroup). The results are discussed within the framework of psychological essentialism, according to which uniquely human characteristics form the essence of the ingroup.
Key Words: emotions essentialism implicit association task (IAT) infra-humanization prejudice
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
