This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Boen, F. Articles by Vanbeselaere, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Relative Impact of Socio-Structural Characteristics on Behavioral Reactions Against Membership in a Low-Status Group

Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders and K.U. Leuven, Filip.Boen{at}psy.kuleuven.ac.be

Norbert Vanbeselaere

K.U. Leuven, Norbert.Vanbeselaere{at}psy.kuleuven.ac.be

This experiment examined how structural characteristics of an intergroup relationship influence the behavioral reactions by members of a low-status group. Participants were 542 pupils (aged 11-12 years) who were led to believe that their school class had a low intergroup status. A 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was created by manipulating the legitimacy of the low group status, the stability of that status, the permeability of the group boundaries, and the perceived of the individual ability of the group members. Contrary to predictions derived from existing intergroup theories, these factors did not interact in determining participants’ strategy choice. The three feasibility factors (i.e. stability, permeability, and individual ability) produced substantial main effects on the choice between individual and collective strategies. The impact of legitimacy on strategy choice was rather modest and limited to collective nonnormative action and acceptance. On the other hand, legitimacy was an important determinant of ingroup bias as measured by a monetary division task. The implications for existing intergroup theories are discussed.

Key Words: collective behavior • intergroup dynamics • relative deprivation • social identity • social structure

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 5, No. 4, 299-318 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430202005004003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Boen, N. Vanbeselaere, and M. Cool Group Status as a Determinant of Organizational Identification After a Takeover: A Social Identity Perspective Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 547 - 560. [Abstract] [PDF]