Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, U.
Right arrow Articles by Christ, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 6, No. 1, 22-36 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430203006001010
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Ethnic Prejudice in East and West Germany: The Explanatory Power of Intergroup Contact

Ulrich Wagner

Philipps-University Marburg, wagner1{at}mailer.uni-marburg.de

Rolf van Dick

Aston University, Birmingham

Thomas F. Pettigrew

University of California Santa Cruz

Oliver Christ

Philipps-University Marburg

Surveys show that respondents from East Germany consistently show higher levels of ethnic prejudice than respondents from West Germany. Comparable differences can be found in statistics on crimes and violence against ethnic minority members. On the basis of three surveys (ALLBUS, 1996, N = 2893; Shell Youth Study (Deutsche Shell), 2000, N = 3560; and our own survey of school students, N = 769), the hypothesis that this difference can be largely explained by contrasting interethnic contact opportunities and experiences is tested and supported. Demographic data show that living in the Eastern or Western part of Germany offers differential opportunities for contact with foreigners. Structural equation analyses reveal that this difference, in turn, influences the number of foreigners in the neighborhood or classroom. As a consequence of these varying opportunities for contact, respondents report marked differences in more intimate and personal contact—such as having foreign friends or experiencing contact of personal importance. Foreign friends and importance of contact proved to be the relevant proximal contact variables that reduce ethnic prejudice. Beyond the German context, these results point to a more inclusive model of intergroup relations.

Key Words: East-West Germany • intergroup contact • prejudice


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. Paolini, M. Hewstone, and E. Cairns
Direct and Indirect Intergroup Friendship Effects: Testing the Moderating Role of the Affective-Cognitive Bases of Prejudice
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2007; 33(10): 1406 - 1420.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
D. A. Miller, E. R. Smith, and D. M. Mackie
Effects of Intergroup Contact and Political Predispositions on Prejudice: Role of Intergroup Emotions
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2004; 7(3): 221 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]