This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, E. R. Articles by Sparks, C. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of Inequality and Reasons for Inequality on Group Identification and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas

Purdue University

Jay W. Jackson

Purdue University-Fort Wayne

Cheri W. Sparks

Purdue University

Three studies tested the hypotheses that inequality among group members, as well as specific reasons for inequality, would significantly influence strength of group identification and cooperative responses to a social dilemma. In Study 1, participants reacted to scenarios describing a public good social dilemma. For some scenarios there was an equal distribution of initial resources, while in others the distribution was unequal. As predicted, group identification led to more cooperation in the dilemma. Starting with more money tended to reduce group identification for females but to increase it for males. In Study 2, participants were faced with an actual one-trial public good social dilemma involving real money. In some conditions, participants began with endowments of different sizes, and the inequality was explained as either random or justified. As predicted, reasons for inequality as well as the fact of inequality had an impact on group identification which, in turn, influenced cooperation in the dilemma. Replicating the results of Study 1, different conditions tended to enhance group identification for women and men. Study 3 was a conceptual replication of Study 2, and resulted in similar findings. Overall, these results may have important implications for real-world dilemmas, where inequality among the parties is almost always a salient feature.

Key Words: group identification • inequality • social dilemma

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 6, No. 2, 201-220 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430203006002005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Jackson Reactions to Social Dilemmas as a Function of Group Identity, Rational Calculations, and Social Context Small Group Research, December 1, 2008; 39(6): 673 - 705. [Abstract] [PDF]