This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kaiser, C. R. Articles by Miller, C. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Derogating the Victim: The Interpersonal Consequences of Blaming Events on Discrimination

University of California at Santa Barbara, c_kaiser{at}psych.ucsb.edu

Carol T. Miller

University of Vermont

This experiment examines whether African Americans who attribute negative events to discrimination incur interpersonal costs, such as being viewed as troublemakers. An African American job candidate who attributed a rejection to discrimination was perceived as more of a troublemaker (e.g. hypersensitive, irritating) than an African American who attributed rejection either to his interviewing skills or to job competition. This devaluation occurred even when discrimination was blatant, such as when the employer made old-fashioned racist statements (e.g. `Black people are just not as smart as White people'). This suggests that members of stigmatized groups may be reluctant to publicly acknowledge being the target of discrimination because it is socially costly to do so.

Key Words: attribution • discrimination • impression formation • prejudice • stigma

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Garcia, A. H. Reser, R. B. Amo, S. Redersdorff, and N. R. Branscombe Perceivers' Responses to In-Group and Out-Group Members Who Blame a Negative Outcome on Discrimination Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2005; 31(6): 769 - 780. [Abstract] [PDF]