Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipponen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Juslin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 6, No. 3, 239-250 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/13684302030063002
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Subgroup Identification, Superordinate Identification and Intergroup Bias between the Subgroups

Jukka Lipponen

Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki, jukka.lipponen{at}helsinki.fi

Klaus Helkama

Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki

Milla Juslin

Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of subgroup and superordinate identification on intergroup differentiation between the subgroups. Hypotheses based on the social identity approach were formed and tested in two samples gathered from the same Finnish shipyard: Sample 1 consisted of the employees of 20 different subcontractors working at the shipyard, and Sample 2 consisted of the shipyard's own workforce. The results from Sample 1 supported the idea that subgroup identification (identification with the subcontractor) is positively related to ingroup bias, and superordinate identification (identification with the shipyard) is negatively related to ingroup bias toward other subgroups under the same superordinate category (shipyard). Among the shipyard's own workers (Sample 2), in turn, identification with the shipyard was significantly related to increased levels of ingroup bias toward the subcontractors working there. The results, thus, indicate that the positive effects of superordinate identification on subgroup relations may be limited to only some of the subgroups.

Key Words: identification • intergroup differentiation • social identity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 325 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
C. H. Stone and R. J. Crisp
Superordinate and Subgroup Identification as Predictors of Intergroup Evaluation in Common Ingroup Contexts
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 493 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
Y. J. Huo and L. E. Molina
Is Pluralism a Viable Model of Diversity? The Benefits and Limits of Subgroup Respect
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2006; 9(3): 359 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]