This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Harinck, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Persuasive Arguments and Beating Around the Bush in Negotiations

University of Amsterdam

Individuals in negotiations often do not talk about their reasons to aim for a certain outcome and design their arguments in such a way that their reasons are unclear to the other party. Three experiments examined the occurrence and the underlying motive for this ‘beating around the bush’ as a function of the conflict issue—conflicting interests, conflicting ideas about intellective problems or conflicting ideas about evaluative problems. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that beating around the bush occurred more frequently in (a specific instance of) conflict of interest than in intellective or evaluative conflict. Experiment 3 suggests that providing arguments for one’s position in terms of self-interest is considered honest but not very smart or strategic.

Key Words: conflict issues • negotiation • persuasive arguments • self-interest

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 7, No. 1, 5-18 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430204039970


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?