| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/1368430204043723 © 2004 SAGE Publications Effects of Status Difference and Group Size in Group Decision MakingNara University
Hokkai Gakuen University The purpose of this study was to empirically test the finding of Ohtsubo, Fujita, and Kamedas (in press) thought experiment regarding the relation between the high status members influence and the number of low status members in the decision-making groups. Against intuition, the thought experiment showed that increasing low status memberswould not necessarily undermine the high status members influence. This study had three-,four-, and five-person groups engage in group decision-making tasks while manipulatingstatus difference by bogus feedback about task-relevant ability. Results showed that the high status members overall influence increased when the number of low status membersincreased from three to four. The Social Decision Scheme Model analyses, however,suggested that the observed aggretation process was different from the one assumed inthe thought experiment.
Key Words: group decision making group size social decision scheme model status difference
|