Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Navarrete, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kirkpatrick, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 7, No. 4, 370-397 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430204046144
© 2004 SAGE Publications

Anxiety and Intergroup Bias: Terror Management or Coalitional Psychology?

C. David Navarrete

University of California, Los Angeles, cdn{at}ucla.edu

Robert Kurzban

University of California, Los Angeles

Daniel M. T. Fessler

University of California, Los Angeles

Lee A. Kirkpatrick

College of William and Mary

Contemplation of death increases support of ingroup ideologies, a result explained by proponents of terror management theory (TMT) as an attempt to buffer existential anxiety. While TMT claims that only death-salient stimuli yield such effects, an evolutionary perspective suggests that increased intergroup bias may occur in response to a wide variety of situations that, in ancestral environments, posed adaptive problems for which marshaling social support was a reliably adaptive response. Four experiments from two cultures produced results consistent with this latter perspective but contrary to TMT. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that, among UCLA undergraduates, participants asked to contemplate aversive scenarios unrelated to death displayed increased support of ingroup ideology. Studies 3 and 4 replicated elements of these results, exploring the moderating effects of self-esteem and collectivism on intergroup bias in two Costa Rican samples. These results indicate that worldview defense effects occur even when death is not salient.

Key Words: authoritarianism • evolutionary psychology • ideology • ingroup • interdependence • outgroup • self-esteem • terror management


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
W. T. TUCKER and S. FERSON
Evolved Altruism, Strong Reciprocity, and Perception of Risk
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2008; 1128(1): 111 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. T. Jost, J. L. Napier, H. Thorisdottir, S. D. Gosling, T. P. Palfai, and B. Ostafin
Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated With Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2007; 33(7): 989 - 1007.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
C. D. Navarrete
Death Concerns and Other Adaptive Challenges: The Effects of Coalition-Relevant Challenges on Worldview Defense in the US and Costa Rica
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2005; 8(4): 411 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]