Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haslam, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kashima, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Psychological Essentialism, Implicit Theories, and Intergroup Relations

Nick Haslam

Brock Bastian

Paul Bain

Yoshihisa Kashima

University of Melbourne

Research on implicit person theories shows that beliefs about the malleability of human attributes have important implications for social cognition, interpersonal behavior, and intergroup relations. We argue that these implications can be understood within the framework of psychological essentialism, which extends work on implicit theories in promising directions. We review evidence that immutability beliefs covary with a broader set of essentialist beliefs, and that these essentialist beliefs are associated with stereotyping and prejudice. We then present recent studies indicating that associations between implicit person theories and stereotyping may be explained in terms of essentialist beliefs, implying a significant role for these beliefs in the psychology of group perception. Finally, we propose ways in which research and theory on essentialist beliefs might clarify and advance research on implicit person theories.

Key Words: essentialism • lay theories • prejudice • stereotypes

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 9, No. 1, 63-76 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206059861
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
D. Abrams and M. A. Hogg
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 10 Years On: Development, Impact and Future Directions
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. J. Rydell, K. Hugenberg, D. Ray, and D. M. Mackie
Implicit Theories About Groups and Stereotyping: The Role of Group Entitativity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2007; 33(4): 549 - 558.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. R. Levy, C.-y. Chiu, and Y.-y. Hong
Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2006; 9(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]