Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 1, No. 2, 165-174 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430298012004

Perceiving and Feeling Personal Discrimination: Motivation or Inhibition for Collective Action?

Mindi D. Foster

University of North Dakota, foster{at}badlands.nodak.edu

Kimberly Matheson

Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada

Relative deprivation and group consciousness theories differ in their predictions of how personal discrimination and personal discontent will be related to taking collective action. According to relative deprivation theory, assessments of personal status should be unrelated to taking collective action. In contrast, group consciousness theories suggest that while perceiving personal discrimination is necessary for collective action to occur, feelings of personal discontent may inhibit it. Female students completed questionnaires assessing their perceptions of, and affective responses to, personal discrimination, as well as their participation in collective actions. A hierarchical regression analysis found that personal discrimination and discontent interacted such that, among women who perceived personal discrimination, women took the most collective actions when they did not feel personally discontent with their status. Implications for the relationship between negative emotions and intergroup behavior were discussed.

Key Words: collective action • personal discrimination

References

  • Abeles, R. P. (1976). Relative deprivation, rising expectations and black militancy. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 119-137.
  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Appelgryn, A. E. M., & Bornman, E. (1996). Relative deprivation in contemporary South Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 381-397.
  • Appelgryn, A. E. M., & Nieuwoudt, J. M. (1988). Relative deprivation and the ethnic attitudes of Blacks and Afrikaans-speaking Whites in South Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 311-323.
  • Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Bartky, S. L. (1977). Toward a phenomenology of feminist consciousness. In M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. Elliston, & J. English (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy (pp. 22-37). Totowa, NJ: Littlefield.
  • Bernstein, M., & Crosby, F. (1980). An empirical examination of relative deprivation theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 442-456.[CrossRef]
  • Birt, C. M., & Dion, K. L. (1987). Relative deprivation theory and responses to discrimination in a gay male and lesbian sample. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 139-145.
  • Bowen, D., Bowen, E., Gawiser, S., & Masotti, L. (1968). Deprivation, mobility, and orientation toward protest of the urban poor. In L. Masotti & D. Bowen (Eds.), Riots and rebellion: Civil violence in the urban community. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Bowles, G., & Duelli Klein, R. (1983). Theories of women's studies. London: Routledge.
  • Brockner, J., & Hulton, A. J. B. (1978). How to reverse the vicious cycle of low self-esteem: The importance of attentional focus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 564-578.[CrossRef]
  • Cohen, J. L. (1985). Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements. Social Research, 52, 663-716.
  • Crawford, T. J., & Naditch, M. (1970). Relative deprivation, powerlessness, and militancy: The psychology of protest. Psychiatry, 33, 208-223.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Crosby, F. J. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Crosby, F. J. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.[Abstract]
  • Crosby, F. J., Pufall, A., Snyder, R. C., O'Connell, M., & Whalen, P. (1989) The denial of personal disadvantage among you, me, and all other ostriches. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 79-99). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Cross, W. E. (1971). The Negro-to-Black conversion experience. Black World, 20, 13-27.
  • De La Rey, C., & Raju, P. (1996). Group relative deprivation: Cognitive versus affective components and protest orientation among Indian South Africans. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 579-588.
  • Dreifus, C. (1973). Women's fate: Rap from a feminist consciousness-raising group. New York: Bantam.
  • Downing, N. E., & Rousch, K. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. Counselling Psychologist, 13, 695-709.
  • Dubé, L., & Guimond, S. (1986). Relative deprivation and social protest: The personal-group issue. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 201-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Folger, R. (1986). A referent cognitions theory of relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 33-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Rheaume, K. (1983). Role playing effects of likelihood and referent outcomes on relative deprivation. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 13, 2-10.
  • Foster, M. D., & Matheson, K. (1995). Double relative deprivation: Combining the personal and political. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1167-1177.[Abstract]
  • Friedman, D., & McAdam, D. (1992). Networks, choices and the life of a social movement. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 156-173). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53-76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Geschwender, B. N., & Geschwender, J. A. (1973). Relative deprivation and participation in the civil rights movement. Social Science Quarterly, 54, 268-273.
  • Guimond, S., & Dube-Simard, L. (1983). Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 526-535.[CrossRef]
  • Hafer, C. L., & Olson, J. M. (1993). Beliefs in a just world, discontent and assertive actions by working women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 30-38.[Abstract]
  • Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Kawakami, K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). The impact of salient self-identities on relative deprivation and action intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 525-540.
  • Kimmel, E. B. (1989). The experience of feminism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 168-186.
  • Lalonde, R. N., & Cameron, J. E. (1993). Behavioral responses to discrimination: The focus on action. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 257-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Martin, J. (1986). The tolerance of injustice. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 217-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Martin, J., Brickman, P., & Murray, A. (1984). Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 484-496.[CrossRef]
  • Muller, E. N. (1972). A test of the partial theory of potential for political violence. American Sociological Review, 38, 721-732.
  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 469-482.
  • Olson, J. M. (1986). Resentment about deprivation: Entitlement and hopefulness as mediators of the effects of qualifications. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 57-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Porter, L. E., & Taylor, D. M. (1992, June). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: The role of social identity. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Canadian Psychological Association, Quebec, Canada.
  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Sarason, I. G. (1975). Anxiety and self-preoccupation. In I. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
  • Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Taylor, D. M., & McKirnan, D. J. (1984). A five-stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291-300.
  • Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254-263.[Abstract]
  • Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1988). The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 20, 15-28.
  • Van Dyk, A. C., & Nieuwoudt, J. M. (1990). The relationship between relative deprivation and the attitudes of rural Afrikaans-speaking women toward Blacks. Journal of Psychology, 124, 513-521.
  • Vanneman, R. D., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1972). Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race, 13, 461-486.
  • Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 275-283.[Abstract]
  • Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301-310.
  • Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Hewstone, R. J. Crisp, A. Contarello, A. Voci, L. Conway, G. Marletta, and H. Willis
Tokens in the Tower: Perceptual Processes and Interaction Dynamics in Academic Settings with 'Skewed', 'Tilted' and 'Balanced' Sex Ratios
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 509 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?