Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mallett, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Swim, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 10, No. 1, 57-69 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207071341
© 2007 SAGE Publications

The Influence of Inequality, Responsibility and Justifiability on Reports of Group-Based Guilt for Ingroup Privilege

Robyn K. Mallett

The University of Virginia, mallett{at}virginia.edu

Janet K. Swim

The Pennsylvania State University

Although members of several social groups report feeling guilt because of their group’s actions, average reports of group-based guilt tend to be quite low. We investigate three antecedents of group-based guilt derived from research on social justice and interpersonal emotion. We find that Whites, men and women perceive inequality, responsibility and justifiability of group differences to the same extent. Moreover, each factor is a key antecedent of guilt for Whites, men and women. We also find an interaction between justifiability and responsibility such that reports of group-based guilt increase as perceptions of ingroup responsibility increase and justifications for group differences decrease. Given the beneficial consequences of group-based guilt for intergroup relations, it is important to understand what factors lead to group-based guilt.

Key Words: group-based guilt • inequality • ingroup responsibility • justifiability • men • Whites • women

References

  • Anderson, N. B. (1989). Racial differences in stress-induced cardiovascular reactivity and hypertension: Current status and substantive issues . Psychological Bulletin, 105, 89-105 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Austin, W., & Walster, E. (1974). Participants’ reactions to ‘equity with the world’ . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 528-548 .[CrossRef]
  • Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach . Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Branscombe, N. R. (1998). Thinking about one’s gender group’s privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men . British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167-184 .
  • Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49-66). New York: Psychology Press .
  • Branscombe, N. R., & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup’s negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Branscombe, N. R., Slugoksi, B., & Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives. (pp. 16-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. (2004). Consequences of national ingroup identification for responses to immoral historical events. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 95-111). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Estrada-Hollenbeck, M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1998). Avoiding and alleviating guilt through prosocial behavior. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 215-231) San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-135 .
  • Harder, D. W., & Greenwald, S .R. (1999). Further validation of the shame and guilt scales of the harder personal feelings questionnaire . Psychological Reports, 85, 271-281 .[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hoffman, M. L. (1994). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In B. Puka (Ed.), Reaching out: Caring, altruism, and prosocial behavior: Vol. 7. Moral development: A compendium (pp. 161-194). New York: Garland .
  • Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Pederson, A. (2004). Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group-based emotions. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 262-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Lerner, M. J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations: Some thoughts on what we know and need to know about justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. New York: Plenum .
  • Mallett, R. K., Huntsinger, J. R., Sinclair, S., & Swim, J. K. (2006). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • McIntosh, P. (1998). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. In M. McGoldrick (Ed.), Re-visioning family therapy: Race, culture, and gender in clinical practice (pp. 147-152). New York: Guilford .
  • Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality . Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 163-180 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged . Social Justice Research, 3, 313-344 .
  • Monteith, M. J., Devine, P. G., & Zuwerink, J. R. (1993). Self-directed versus other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 198-210 .[CrossRef]
  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International .
  • Rensmann, L. (2004). Collective guilt, national identity, and political processes in contemporary Germany. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 169-190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions. A structural theory . In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social personality, 5, 11-35 .
  • Russo, N. F. (1995). Women’s mental health: Research agenda for the twenty-first century. In C. V. Willie, P. P. Rieker, B. M. Kramer, & B. S. Brown (Eds.), Mental health, racism, and sexism. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press .
  • Schmidt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). Gender inequality and the intensity of men’s collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 75-92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Sprecher, S. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships . Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309-321 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Swim, J. K., & Miller, D. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500-514 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Turner, C. B., & Kramer, B. M. (1995). Connections between racism and mental health. C. V. Willie, P. P. Rieker, B. M. Kramer, & B. S. Brown (Eds.), Mental health, racism, and sexism. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press .
  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
  • Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1975). Equity and social justice . Journal of Social Issues, 31, 21-43 .
  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., Berscheid, E., Austin, W.Traupmann, J., & Utne, M. K. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon . Paper received 5 December 2005; revised version accepted 3 August 2006.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mallett, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Swim, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?