Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gill, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Andreychik, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 10, No. 1, 87-106 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207071343
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Explanation and Intergroup Emotion: Social Explanations as a Foundation of Prejudice-Related Compunction

Michael J. Gill

Lehigh University, m.gill{at}lehigh.edu

Michael R. Andreychik

Lehigh University

Two studies examined whether social explanations—causal frameworks used to make sense of a group’s status and behavior—are associated with prejudice-related compunction. In Study 1, based on Devine, Monteith, Zuwerink, & Elliott, (1991), participants who endorsed external explanations (e.g. low socioeconomic status of Blacks stems from historical maltreatment) showed a particularly strong tendency to experience compunction in response to prejudice-related discrepancies. Study 2 involved a novel paradigm. Participants were induced to admit that they would discriminate against Black males. Conceptually replicating Study 1, endorsement of external explanations was positively associated with compunction in response to this imagined discrimination. Across both studies, there was also evidence that the effects of external explanations are not explicable in terms of internal motivation to avoid prejudice, global prejudice, or global positive evaluation of African Americans. Discussion centers on the importance of explanations in shaping intergroup emotions and how the concept of explanation links the intergroup emotion literature to other emotion literatures.

Key Words: prejudice-related compunction • social explanations

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality’. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). New York: Academic Press .
  • Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford .
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Buchanan, G. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (Eds.) (1995). Explanatory style. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18 .
  • Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Elliott, A. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817-830 .[CrossRef]
  • Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835-848 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • D’Souza, D. (1995). The end of racism. New York: Free Press .
  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Selt-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press .
  • Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford .
  • Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill .
  • Gill, M. J., & Andreychik, M. R. (2006). Yours is to reason why: Social explanations as a foundation of intergroup attitudes. Unpublished manuscript, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512 .[CrossRef]
  • Gopnik, A. (2000). Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal knowledge: The function, evolution, and phenomenology of the theory formation system. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 299-323). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
  • Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Guimond, S., Begin, G., & Palmer, D. L. (1989). Education and causal attributions: The development of ‘person-blame’ and ‘system-blame’ ideology . Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 126-140 .[CrossRef]
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley .
  • Hewstone, M. (1990). The ‘ultimate attribution error’?: A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution . European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311-335 .
  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect . Psychological Review, 94, 319-340 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197-208 .[CrossRef]
  • Jose, P. E. (2002). ModGraph: A computer programme to graphically display moderation [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/psyc/staff/paul-jose/files/modgraph/modgraph.php.
  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of system-justification and the production of false consciousness. [Special Issue: Structure, function, and process] . British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27 .
  • Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905 .[CrossRef]
  • Keller, J. (2005). In genes me trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to medianisms of motivated social cognition . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686-702 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kluegel, J. R., & Bobo, L. (1993). Dimensions of Whites’ beliefs about the Black-White socioeconomic gap. In P. M. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 127-147). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
  • Lepore, L., & Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 275-287 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum .
  • Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1421-1436 .
  • Lopez, G. E., Gurin, P., & Nagda, B. A. (1998). Education and understanding structural causes for group inequalities . Political Psychology, 19, 305-329 .[CrossRef]
  • Malle, B. F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
  • McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. London: Academic Press .
  • Michela, J. L., & Wood, J. V. (1986). Causal attributions in health and illness. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 5, pp. 179-235). New York: Academic Press .
  • Monteith, M. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469-485 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Monteith, M. J., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., & Czopp, A. M. (2002). Putting the brakes on prejudice: On the development and operation of cues for control . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1029-1050 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Monteith, M. J., & Voils, C. I. (1998). Proneness to prejudiced responses: Toward understanding the authenticity of self-reported discrepancies . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 901-916 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Monteith, M. J., Devine, P. G., & Zuwerink, J. R. (1993). Self-directed versus other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies . Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64, 198-210 .[CrossRef]
  • Moskowitz, G. B., Gollwitzer, P. M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167-184 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • O’Laughlin, M. J., & Malle, B. F. (2002). How people explain actions performed by groups and individuals . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 33-48 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Oskamp, S. (Ed.). (2000). Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s congnitive analysis of prejudice . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476 .[Abstract]
  • Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Reyna, C., Henry, P. J., Korfmacher, W., & Tucker, A. (2005). Examining the principles in principled conservatism: The role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 109-128 .
  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press .
  • Ross, M., & Miller, D. T. (2002). The justice motive in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Taylor, D. M., & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162-171 .[Abstract]
  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag .
  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Rocher, S. (2002). Subjective essentialism and the emergence of stereotypes. In C. McGarty, & V. Yzerbyt (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (pp. 38-66). New York: New York University Press .
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialist view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell .

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gill, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Andreychik, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?