Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boldry, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 10, No. 2, 157-178 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207075153
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Measuring the Measures

A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Measures of Outgroup Homogeneity

Jennifer G. Boldry

Montana State University, jennifer_boldry{at}yahoo.com

Lowell Gaertner

University of Tennessee

Jeff Quinn

Duke University

We meta-analytically synthesized the intergroup variability literature (177 effect sizes, from 173 independent samples, and 12,078 participants) to test the potential moderating effect of 11 measures of perceived variability. Aggregating across the measures, we detected a small but reliable tendency to perceive more variability among ingroup than outgroup members and such outgroup homogeneity was stronger among non-minimal than minimal groups. Furthermore, analyses that distinguished among the 11 measures revealed systematic discrepancies among the patterns of perception detected by those measures. Those systematic discrepancies further varied across social contexts defined by relative group status, with some measures yielding ingroup homogeneity and others outgroup homogeneity. We discuss the possibility that the measures of variability require different mental activities that interact with contextually induced cognitive and motivational processes to yield disparate intergroup perceptions.

Key Words: group perception • group variability • heterogeneity • ingroup homogeneity • intergroup perception • intergroup status • meta-analysis • outgroup homogeneity • relative group status

References

  • Bardach, L. & Park, B. (1996). The effect of ingroup and outgroup status on memory for consistent and inconsistent behavior of an individual. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 169—178.[Abstract]
  • *Boldry, J.G., & Gaertner, L. (2006). Separating status from power as an antecedent of intergroup perception. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations , 9, 377—400.[CrossRef]
  • *Boldry, J.G., & Kashy, D.A. (1999). Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1200—1212.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Brauer, M. (2001). Intergroup perception in the social context: The effects of social status and group membership on perceived outgroup homogeneity and ethnocentrism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 37, 15—31.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Brewer, M.B., Dull, V., & Lui, L. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 656—670.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Brewer, M. ., Weber, J.G., & Carini, B. (1995). Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization versus individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 69, 29—40.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Brigham, J.C. & Barkowitz, P. (1978). Do `they all look alike?' The effect of race, sex, experience and attitudes on the ability to recognize faces. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 306—318.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Brigham, J.C., Maas, A., Snyder, L.D., & Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 673—681.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Brigham, J.C., & Ready, D.J. (1985). Own-race bias in lineup construction. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 415—424.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Brigham, J.C., & Williamson, N.L. (1979). Cross-racial recognition and age: When you're over 60 do they still `all look alike?' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 218—222.[Abstract]
  • *Brown, R., & Smith A. (1989). Perceptions of and by minority groups: The case of women in academia. European Journal of Social Psychology , 19, 61—75.[ISI]
  • *Brown, R., & Wootten-Millward, L. (1993). Perceptions of group homogeneity during group formation and change. Social Cognition , 11, 126—149.[ISI]
  • Buckhout, R., &Regan, S. (1988). Explorations in research on the other-race effect in face recognition. In M. M. Grunberg & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues: Vol. 1. Memory in everyday life (pp. 40—46). New York: Wiley.
  • *Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (1998). Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition. Vision Research , 38, 2455—2468.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Cabecinhas, R., & Amancio, L. (1999). Asymmetries in the perception of other as a function of social position and context. Swiss Journal of Psychology , 58, 40—50.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the Multitrait— multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81—105.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Carli, L.L., & Eagly, A.H. (1999). Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 203—222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • *Carroo, A.W. (1987). Recognition of faces as a function of race, attitudes, and reported cross-racial friendships. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 319—325.[ISI]
  • *Castano, E., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. (1998). The highs and lows of group homogeneity. Behavioural Processes, 42, 219—238.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Chance, J.E.,Goldstein, A., &Anderson, B. (1986). Recognition memory for infant faces: An analog of the other-race effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 24, 257—260.[ISI]
  • *Chance, J.E., Goldstein, A., & McBride, L. (1975). Differential experience and recognition memory for faces. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 243—253.[ISI]
  • *Chance, J.E., Turner, A.L., & Goldstein, A.G. (1982). Development of differential recognition for own- and other-race faces. Journal of Psychology , 112, 29—37.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879—894.
  • *Cross, J.F., Cross,J., & Daly J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty in the recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393—396.[ISI]
  • *De la Haye, A. (2002). Unpublished data, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • Doojse, B., Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642—655.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Eagly, A.H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A.B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123—174). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., & de Vries, N., & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497—413.[ISI]
  • Ellemers, N., van Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186—198.[Abstract]
  • *Eller, A. (2001). Putting Pettigrew's reformulated model to the test: The intergroup contact theory in transition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
  • *Ellis, H.D., Davies, G.M., & McMurran, M. (1979). Recall of white and black faces by white and black witnesses using the photofit system. Human Factors, 21, 55—59.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Ellis, H.D., & Derogowski, J.B. (1981). Within-race and between-race recognition of transformed and untransformed faces. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 27—35.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Ellis, H., Shepard, J., & Bruce, A. (1973). The effects of age and sex upon adolescents' recognition of faces. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 173—174.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Feinman, S., & Entwisle, D.R. (1976). Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. Child Development, 47, 506—510.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fiedler, K., Kemmelmeier, M., & Freytag, P. (1999). Explaining asymmetric intergroup judgments through differential aggregation: Computer simulations and some new evidence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 1—10). New York : Wiley.
  • Field, A.P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6, 161—180.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Field, A.P. (2003). The problems using fixedeffects models of meta-analysis on real-world data. Understanding Statistics, 2, 77—96.[CrossRef]
  • Fiske, S.T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621—628.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fiske, S.T., & Depret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence, and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 31—61). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • *Frable. D. E. S., & Bem, S.L. (1985). If you are gender schematic, all member of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459—468.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Galper, R.E. (1973). Functional race membership and recognition of faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 455—462.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Garcia-Marques, L., & Hamilton, D.L. (1996). Resolving the apparent discrepancy between the incongruency effect and the expectancy-based illusory correlation effect: The TRAP model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 845—860.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Going, M., & Read J.D. (1974). Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 109—110.[ISI]
  • *Goldstein, A.G., & Chance, J.E. (1979). Do foreign faces really look alike? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 111—113.[ISI]
  • *Goldstein, A.G., & Chance, J.E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105, 47—59.[ISI]
  • *Gramzow, R.H., Gaertner, L., & Sedikides, C. (2001). Memory for ingroup and outgroup information in a minimal group context: The self and an informational base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 188—205.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Guinote, A. (2001). The perception of group variability in a non-minority and a minority context: When adaptation leads to outgroup differentiation . British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 117—132.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Guinote, A., Judd, C.M., & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708—721.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Haslam, S.A., Oakes, P.J., McGarty, C., Turner, J.C., Reynolds, K.J., & Eggins, R.A. (1996). Stereotyping and social influence: The mediation of stereotype applicability and sharedness by the views of ingroup and outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 369—397.[ISI]
  • *Haslam, S.A., Oakes, P.J., Turner, J.C., & McGarty, C. (1995). Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 139—160.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hedges, L.V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics , 6, 107—128.[CrossRef]
  • Hedges, L.V., & Vevea, J.L. (1998). Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis . Psychological Methods, 3, 486—504.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Hewstone, M., Hantzi, A., & Johnston, L. (1991). Social categorization and person memory: The pervasiveness of race as an organizing principle. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 517—528.[ISI]
  • Hewstone, M., Islam, M.R., & Judd, C.M. (1993). Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 779—793.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Howard, J.W., & Rothbart, M. (1980). Social categorization and memory for ingroup and outgroup behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 38, 301—310.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative knowledge in psychology. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 275—292.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Jackson, L.A., & Hymes, R.W. (1985). Gender and social categorization: Familiarity and ingroup polarization in recall evaluation. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 81—88[ISI]
  • *Jackson, J.W., & Smith E.R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 120—135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • *Jalbert, N.L., & Getting, J. (1992). Racial and gender issues in facial recognition . In F. Loesel & D. Bender (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 309—316). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
  • Jones, E.E., Wood, G.C., & Quattrone, G.A. (1981). Perceived variability of personal characteristics of ingroups and outgroups: The role of knowledge and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 7, 523—528.[Abstract]
  • *Jost, J. (1995). Psychology and the social order revisited. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. *Judd , C.M., & Park, B. (1988). Outgroup homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778—788.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Judd, C.M., Park, B., Ryan, C.S., Brauer, M., & Kraus, S. (1995). Stereotypes and ethnocentrism: Diverging interethnic perceptions of African American and white American youth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 460—481.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Judd, C.M., Ryan, C.S., & Park, B. (1991). Accuracy in the judgment of ingroup and outgroup variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 61, 366—379.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kashima, E.S., & Kashima, Y. (1993). Perceptions of general variability of social groups . Social Cognition, 11, 1—21.[ISI]
  • *Kelly, C. (1989). Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity . British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 239—250.[ISI]
  • *Lee, Y.T. (1992). Ingroup preference and homogeneity among African-American and Chinese-American students. Journal of Social Psychology , 133, 225—235.[ISI]
  • Lee, Y.T. (1993). Perceived homogeneity and familial loyalty between Chinese and Americans. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 12, 260—267.
  • *Lindsay, D.S., Jack, P.C., & Christian, M.A. (1991). Other-race face perception . Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 587—589.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Linville, P.W., Fischer, G.W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of ingroup and outgroup members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165—188.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Linville, P.W., Fischer, G.W., & Yoon, C. (1996). Perceived covariation among the features of ingroup and outgroup members: The outgroup covariation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 421—436.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Linville, P.W., Salovey, P., & Fischer, G.W. (1986). Stereotyping and perceived distributions of social characteristics: An application to ingroup-outgroup perception. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 165—208), New York: Academic Press.
  • *Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). They all look alike and so do we...sometimes: Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity as a function of sex and context . British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 111—124.[ISI]
  • *Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1998). Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 31—75). New York : Wiley.
  • *Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Deaux, K., & Dafflon, A. (1998). Group homogeneity as a function of relative social status. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 255—273.
  • *Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Eagly, A.H., & Stewart, T.L. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193—217.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Lui, L., & Brewer, M.B. (1983). Recognition accuracy as evidence of category-consistency effects in person memory. Social Cognition, 2, 89—107.
  • *Malpass, R.S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition of faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 330—334.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Malpass, R.S., Lavigeur, H., & Weldon, D.E. (1973). Verbal and visual training in face recognition . Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 285—292.[ISI]
  • *Mason, S.E. (1986). Age and gender as factors in facial recognition and identification. Experimental Aging Research, 12, 151—154.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *McKelvie, S.J. (1981). Sex differences in memory for faces. Journal of Psychology, 107, 109—125.[ISI]
  • Morris, S.B., & DeShon, R.P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105—125.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mullen, B. & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 10, 233—252.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Neuberg, S.L., & Fiske, S.T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy driven attention, and individuating processes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431—444.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Ostrom, T.M., Carpenter, S.L., Sedikides, C., & Li, F. (1993). Differential processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 64, 21—34.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Ostrom, T.M., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Outgroup homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536—552.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *O'Toole, A.J., Deffenbacher, K.A., Valentine, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory and Cognition, 2, 208—224.
  • Park, B., & Hastie, R. (1987). Perception of variability in category development: Instance versus abstraction based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 621—635.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Park. B., & Judd, C.M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173—191.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Park, B., Judd, C.M., & Ryan, C.S. (1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 2). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of outgroup homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of ingroup and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 42, 1051—1068.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Park, B., Ryan, C.S., & Judd, C.M. (1992). Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for ingroups and outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 553—567.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Pickett, C.L., & Brewer, M. (2001). Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived ingroup and outgroup homogeneity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 341—348.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Platz, S.J., & Hosch, H.M. (1988). Cross-racial/ ethnic eyewitness identification: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 972—984.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Quattrone, G.A., & Jones, E.E. (1980). The perception of group variability within ingroups and outgroups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141—152.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231—244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Rothgerber, H. (1997). External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1206—1212.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rubin, M., Hewstone, M., Crisp, R.J., Voci, A., & Richards, Z. (2002). Gender outgroup homogeneity: The roles of differential familiarity, gender differences, and group size. Unpublished manuscript, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
  • *Rubin, M., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2001). Stretching the boundaries: strategic perceptions of intragroup variability. European Journal of Social Psychology , 31, 413—429.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Rubin, M., Richards, Z., & Hewstone, M. (2000). Unpublished data, Cardiff University , Cardiff, Wales.
  • *Ryan, C.S., & Bogart, L.M. (1997). Development of new group members' ingroup and outgroup stereotypes: Changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 719—712.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Ryan, C.S., & Judd, C.M. (1992). False consensus and outgroup homogeneity: A methodological note on their relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology , 31, 269—283.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Ryan, C.S., Judd, C.M., & Park, B. (1996). Effects of racial stereotypes on judgments of individuals: The moderating role of perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 71—103.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Sedikides, C., (1997). Differential processing of ingroup and outgroup information: The role of relative group status in permeable boundary groups . European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 121—144.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Sedikides, C., & Ostrom, T.S. (1993). Perceptions of group variability: Moving from an uncertain crawl to a purposeful stride. Social Cognition , 11, 165—174.[ISI]
  • *Shepherd, J.W., Deregowski, J.B., & Ellis, H.D. (1974). A cross-cultural study of recognition memory for faces. International Journal of Psychology, 9, 205—211.
  • Sidanius, J., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1996). Consensual social dominance orientation and its correlates within the hierarchical structure of American society [special issue]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations: Prejudice, Discrimination, and Conflict, 20, 385—408.
  • Sidanius, J., Liu, J.H., Shaw, J.S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338—336.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Rabinowitz, J.L. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, and ideological asymmetry: A social dominance interpretation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194—216.[Abstract]
  • Simon, B. (1992). The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: Reintroducing the intergroup context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 3). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • *Simon, B., & Brown. R. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703—711.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Simon, B., & Hamilton, D.L. (1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative ingroup size and ingroup status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 699—711.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Simon, B., & Hastedt, C. (1999). Self-aspects as social categories: The role of personal importance and valence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 479—487.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Simon, B., & Mummendey, A. (1990). Perceptions of relative group size and group homogeneity: We are the majority and they are all the same. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 351—356.[ISI]
  • *Simon, B., & Pettigrew, T.F. (1990). Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 269—286.[ISI]
  • *Stephen, W.G. (1977). Cognitive differentiation in intergroup perception . Sociometry, 40, 50—58.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Stewart, T.L., & Vassar, P.M. (2000). The effect of occupational status cues on memory for male and female targets. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 24, 161—169.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Stewart, T.L., Vassar, P.M., Sanchez, D.T., & David, S.E. (2000). Attitude toward women's societal roles moderates the effect of gender cues on target individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 143—157.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tajfel H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33—47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
  • *Thompson, S.C., Kohles, J.C., Otsuki, T.A., & Kent, D.A. (1997). Perceptions of attitudinal similarity in ethnic groups in the US: Ingroup and outgroup homogeneity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 209—220.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • *Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion, and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologia, 61, 259—273.[CrossRef]
  • *Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671—703.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Verkuyten, M., & Kwa, G.A. (1996). Ethnic selfidentification, ethnic involvement, and group differentiation among Chinese youth in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 35—48.[ISI]
  • Voci, A. (2000). Perceived group variability and the salience of personal and social identity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (pp. 177—221). New York : Wiley.
  • *Vokey, J.R., & Read, D. (1988) Typicality, familiarity, and the recognition of male and female faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 489—495.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • *Weimann, G., Fishman, G., & Rattner, A. (1988). Social distance and misidentification. Research Communications, 27, 217—225.
  • *Wilder, D.A. (1984). Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 323—333.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • * Indicates articles included in the meta-analysis.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boldry, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?