|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 10, No. 3,
373-382 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207078697
© 2007 SAGE Publications
What Do We Think About Muslims? The Validity of Westerners' Implicit Theories About the Associations Between Muslims' Religiosity, Religious Identity, Aggression Potential, and Attitudes Toward Terrorism
Peter Fischer
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, pfischer{at}psy.uni-muenchen.de
Tobias Greitemeyer
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
Andreas Kastenmüller
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
In a series of three studies, we investigated the validity of implicit theories that the German public holds regarding Muslims. German participants expected Muslims to be more aggressive than Christians, and therefore be more supportive of terrorism than Christians. Furthermore, Muslims were assumed to be more intrinsically religious and to hold a stronger identity with their religion than Christians (Study 1). However, self-assessment surveys of Muslims and Christians in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS: ex-Soviet Union) revealed that Muslims were not more aggressive, more intrinsically religious, or more supportive of terrorism than Christians. In contrast, Muslims reported a stronger religious identification than Christians (Study 2). Correspondingly, threat to religious identity was found to affect only Muslims', but not Christians', attitudes toward terrorism conducted by outgroup perpetrators. In contrast to Germans' implicit theories regarding Muslims, it was the importance of religious identity and not increased aggression potential that mediated this effect (Study 3).
Key Words: aggression • Christians • Muslims • religious identification • terrorism
References
- Ahmed, S. (2004). Religiosity, identity, and pro-social values and behavior: A study of muslim youth. Fairleigh Dickinson University , US: Univ Microfilms International .
- Allport, G.W., & Ross, J.M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432—443 .[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator— mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173—1182 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bergin, A.E. (1991). Values and religious issues in psychotherapy and mental health . American Psychologist, 46, 394—403 .[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Burris, C.T., & Jackson L.M. (2000). Social identity and the true believer: Responses to threatened self-stereotypes among the intrinsically religious British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 257—278 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Buss, A.H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452—459 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dweck, C.S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives . Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267—285 .[CrossRef][ISI]
- Feagin, J.R. (1964). Prejudice and religious types: A focused study of Southern fundamentalists . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 4, 3—13 .[CrossRef][ISI]
- Hill, P.C., & Pargament, K.I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research . American Psychologist, 58, 64—74 .[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hong, Y., Levy, S.R., & Chiu, C. (2001). The contribution of the lay theories approach to the study of groups . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 98—106 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hunsberger, B. (1996). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and hostility toward homosexuals in non-Christian religious groups . International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6, 39—49 .[CrossRef]
- Hunsberger, B., Owusu, V., & Duck, R. (1999). Religion and prejudice in Ghana and Canada: Religious fundamentalism, right-wing auttoritarianism and attitudes toward homosexuals and women . International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 181—194 .[CrossRef]
- Jackson, L.M., & Hunsberger, B. (1999). An intergroup perspective on religion and prejudice . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 509—523 .[CrossRef][ISI]
- Levy, S.R. (1999). Reducing prejudice: Lessons from social-cognitive factors underlying perceiver differences in prejudice . Journal of Social Issues, 55, 745—765 .[CrossRef][ISI]
- Levy, S.R., Plaks, J.E., Hong, Y.Y., Chiu, C.Y., & Dweck, C.S. (2001). Static vs. dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 156—168 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Madon, S., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1997). In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 791—809 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Regnerus, M.D. (2003). Linked lives, faith, and behavior: An intergenerational model of religious influence on adolescent delinquency . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 189—203 .[CrossRef][ISI]
- Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston .
- Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology and intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1—39 .
- Zwingmann, C., Hellmeister, G., & Ochsmann, R. (1994). Intrinsische und extrinsische Orientierung: Fragebogenskalen zum Einsatz in der empirisch-religionspsychologischen Forschung [Intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation: Questionnaire scales in use for psychological studies of religion] . Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 131—139 .
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
