This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Okimoto, T. G. Articles by Tyler, T. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Is Compensation Enough? Relational Concerns in Responding to Unintended Inequity

New York University, tyler.okimoto{at}flinders.edu.au

Tom R. Tyler

New York University

Traditional justice models suggest that monetary compensation is an adequate response to unintended distributive harm. This perspective is widely accepted in real world settings, and is manifested in policies ranging from worker compensation to the court-based tort system. Drawing on the arguments from relational models of authority, we hypothesize that compensation for losses may be viewed by victims as an inadequate response to the situation, even when those losses are accidental and not the result of intentional harm. In four experimental studies, respondents were asked to react to the receipt of monetary compensation for accidental distributive inequities under varying degrees of relational concern. Results indicate that judgments about the favorability of compensation are only one aspect of people's reaction to responses to harm. In each case, victims displayed more favorable reactions toward the group when compensation was supplemented by relational concern.

Key Words: accidental • compensation • distributive injustice • relational concern

References

• Austin, W., Walster, E., & Utne, M. (1976). Equity and the law: The effect of a harmdoer's `suffering in the act' on liking and assigned punishment. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 163—190). New York: Academic Press.
• Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173—1182.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Blackman, M.C., & Stubbs, E.C. (2001). Apologies: Genuine admissions of blameworthiness or scripted, sympathetic responses. Psychological Reports, 88, 45—50.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bobocel, D.R., & Zdaniuk, A. (2005). How can explanations be used to foster organizational justice? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 469—498). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Brickman, P. (1977). Crime and punishment in sports and society. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 140—164.[ISI]
• Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B.M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189—208.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2005). How, when, and why does outcome favorability interact with procedural fairness? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 525—554). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Brown, B.B., & Harris, P.B. (1989). Residential burglary victimization: Reactions to the invasion of primary territory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 119—132.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Carlsmith, K.M., Darley, J.M., & Robinson, P.H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284—299.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Dailey, R.C., & Kirk, D.J. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intention to turnover. Human Relations, 45, 305—317.[Abstract]
• Darley, J.M. & Pittman, T.S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324—336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Feather, N.T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
• Gold, G., & Weiner, B. (2000). Remorse, confession, group identity and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 291—300.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 235—256). New York, Springer-Verlag.
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
• Hogan, R., & Emler, N.P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. New York: Academic Press.
• Horai, J. (1977). Attributional conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 88—100.[ISI]
• Huo, Y.J., Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem, is assimilation the answer. Psychological Science, 7, 40—45.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Jones, D.A., & Skarlicki, D.P. (2003). The relationship between perceptions of fairness and voluntary turnover among retail employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1226—1243.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Kahan, D.M. (1996). What do alternative sanctions mean? University of Chicago Law Review, 63, 591—653.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Karp, D.R. (1998). The judicial and judicious use of shame penalties. Crime and Delinquency, 44, 277—294.[CrossRef]
• Konovsky, M.A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698—707.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
• Pepitone, A. (1975). Social psychological perspectives on crime and punishment. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 197—216.[ISI]
• Rumsey, M.G. (1976). Effects of defendant background and remorse on sentencing judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 64—68.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Schwartz, G.S., Kane, T.R., Joseph, J.M., & Tedeschi, J.T. (1978). The effects of post-transgression remorse on perceived aggression, attributions of intent, and level of punishment. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 293—297.[ISI]
• Shaw, J.C., Wild, E., & Colquitt, J.A. (2003). To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 444—458.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Skarlicki, D.P., Ellard, J.H., & Kelln, B.R.C. (1998). Third party perceptions of layoff: Procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 119—127.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Tyler, T.R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Tyler, T.R., (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850—863.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Tyler, T.R. & Blader, S.L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349—361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Tyler, T.R., Boeckmann, R.J., Smith, H.J., & Huo, Y.J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115—191). New York: Academic Press.
• Umbreit, M.S. (1989). Crime victims seeking fairness, not revenge: Toward restorative justice. Federal Probation, 53, 52—57.[ISI]
• Vidmar, N. (2001). Retribution and revenge. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law. New York: Plenum.
• Vidmar, N. (2002). Retributive justice: Its social context. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 291—317). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Walster, E., Walster, G.W., & Berscheid, E. (1978) Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Wood, R.E., & Mitchell, T.R. (1981). Manager behavior in a social context: The impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 356—378.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Okimoto, T. G. Articles by Tyler, T. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?