Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 10, No. 4, 427-441 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207081533
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Improve Intergroup Attitudes

Rhiannon N. Turner

University of Leeds, r.n.turner{at}leeds.ac.uk

Richard J. Crisp

University of Kent

Emily Lambert

University of Birmingham

We investigated whether simply imagining contact with outgroup members can improve intergroup attitudes. In Experiment 1, young participants who imagined talking to an elderly person subsequently showed lower levels of intergroup bias than participants who imagined an outdoor scene. In Experiment 2, young participants who imagined talking to an elderly person subsequently showed lower levels of intergroup bias than participants who simply thought about elderly people, ruling out a priming explanation for our findings. In Experiment 3, heterosexual men who imagined talking to a homosexual man subsequently evaluated homosexual men more positively, perceived there to be greater variability among them, and experienced less intergroup anxiety compared to a control group. The effect of imagined contact on outgroup evaluations was mediated by reduced intergroup anxiety. These findings suggest that imagining intergroup contact could represent a viable alternative for reducing prejudice where actual contact between groups is impractical.

Key Words: intergroup contact • reducing prejudice

References

  • Aberson, C.L., Shoemaker, C., & Tomolillo, C. (2004). Implicit bias and contact: The role of interethnic friendships. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 335—347.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
  • Allport, G.W. (1985). The historical background of social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. I, 3rd ed., pp. 1—46). New York: Random House.
  • Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230—244.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Blair, I.V., Ma, J.E., & Lenton, A.P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828—841.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Census (2001). National statistics government website: Neighbourhood statistics. Retrieved July 24, 2006, from http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk.
  • Crisp, R.J., Hewstone, M., & Rubin, M. (2001). Does multiple categorization reduce intergroup bias? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 76—89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Devine, P.G., & Monteith, M.J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339—360). New York: Guilford.
  • Fazio, R.H., Powell, M.C., & Herr, P.M. (1983). Toward a process model of the attitude—behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 723—735.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Garcia, S.M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G.B., & Darley, J.M. (2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 843—853.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Graham, J.A., & Cohen, R. (1997). Race and sex as factors in children's sociometric ratings and friendship choices. Social Development, 6, 355—372.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Herek, G.M., & Capitanio, J.P. (1996). `Some of my best friends': Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412—424.[Abstract]
  • Hewstone, M., & Hamberger ( 2000). Perceived variability and stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 103—124.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Islam, R.M., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimension of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability and out-group attitudes: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700—710.[Abstract]
  • Liebkind, K., & McAlister, A.L. (1999). Extended contact through peer modelling to promote tolerance in Finland. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 765—780.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Oskamp, S., & Jones, J.M. (2000). Promising practice in reducing prejudice: A report from the President's Initiative on Race. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 319—334). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgements of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770—786.[Abstract]
  • Pendry, L.F., & Macrae, C.N. (1999). Cognitive load and person memory: The role of perceived group variability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 925—942.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Pettigrew, T.F. (1998). Intergroup contact: Theory, research and new perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65—85.
  • Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751—783.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Phinney, J.S., Ferguson, D.L., & Tate, J.D. (1997). Intergroup attitudes among ethnic minority adolescents: A causal model. Child Development, 68, 955—969.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Plant, E.A., & Devine, P.G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 790—801.[Abstract]
  • Quattrone, G.A., & Jones, E.F. (1980). The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141—152.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Ryan, C.S., Bogart, L.M., & Vender, J.P. (2000). Effects of perceived group variability on the gathering of information about individual group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 90—101.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Ryan, C.S., Judd, C.M., & Park, B. (1996). Effects of racial stereotypes on judgments of individuals: The moderating role of perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 71—103.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Shelton, J.N., & Richeson, J.A. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 91—107.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stangor, C., Sullivan, L.A., & Ford, T.E. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9, 359—380.[ISI]
  • Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157—176.[ISI]
  • Tropp, L.R., & Pettigrew, T.F. (2005). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1145—1158.[Abstract]
  • Turner, R.N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (in press). Reducing explicit and implicit prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  • Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37—54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wolsko, C., Park, B., Judd, C.M., & Bachelor, J. (2003). Intergroup contact: Effects on group evaluations and perceived variability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 93—110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wright, S.C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S.A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73—90.[CrossRef][ISI]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?