|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 10, No. 4,
443-455 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207081534
© 2007 SAGE Publications
The Role of Heterosexual Identity Threat in Differential Support for Same-Sex `Civil Unions' versus `Marriages'
Michael T. Schmitt
Simon Fraser University, mschmitt{at}sfu.ca
Justin J. Lehmiller
Purdue University
Allison L. Walsh
Purdue University
Although US citizens generally oppose the legal recognition of same-sex marriages more than civil unions, the reasons for this opposition remain unclear. In two experiments, we presented participants with one of two hypothetical state laws legally recognizing same-sex partnerships. The laws differed only in the label applied to those partnerships (i.e. civil union or marriage). Across both studies, participants expressed less support for same-sex marriages relative to civil unions. In addition, participants considering the marriage law found it more threatening to heterosexuals' rights and social status than did those reading the civil union law, and this threat partially mediated the effect of the relationship label on support for the law. Thus, consistent with social identity theory, opposition to the same-sex marriage label is, in part, due to perceived threats to heterosexual identity.
Key Words: civil union • gay and lesbian • identity threat • same-sex marriage • social identity
References
- Abrams, D., Carter, J., & Hogg, M.A. (1989). Perceptions of male homosexuality: An application of social identity theory. Social Behaviour, 4, 253—264.[ISI]
- Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113—133.[CrossRef]
- Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator—mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173—1182.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Branscombe, N.R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35—58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Brewer, P.R., & Wilcox, C. (2005). Same-sex marriage and civil unions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 599—616.[Free Full Text]
- Cauchon, D. (2004, March). Civil unions gain support. USA Today. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-03-09-gaymarriage-usat_x.htm.
- Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684—696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Farhi, P. (2004, May). Kerry again opposes same-sex marriage. Washington Post. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28118-2004May14.html.
- Frigon, J.Y., & Laurencelle, L. (1993). Analysis of covariance: a proposed algorithm. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 1—18.[Abstract]
- Haslam, S.A., & McGarty, C. (1998). Research methods and statistics in psychology. London: Sage.
- Haddock, G., & Zanna, M.P. (1998). Authoritarianism, values, and the structure of antigay attitudes. In G. M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation:Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay issues (Vol. 4, pp. 82—107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Herek, G.M. (1988). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451—477.[ISI]
- Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862—879.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kinder, D.R., & Sears, D.O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414—431.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Kite, M.E., & Whitley, B.E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336—353.[Abstract]
- Lannutti, P.J. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring the meanings of same-sex marriage within the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 5—18.[Abstract]
- Longley, R. (2004). Bush backs gay marriage ban amendment; Blames `activist' judges for changing meaning of marriage. Retrieved July 4, 2005 from http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/rightsandfreedoms/a/bushvgays.htm.
- Pew Research Center. (2003). Religious beliefs underpin opposition to homosexuality; Republicans unified, Democrats split on gay marriage. Retrieved July 3, 2005 from http://people-press.org/dataarchive/.
- Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23—45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7—24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
- Turner, J.C., & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 201—234). London: Academic Press.
- Vescio, T.K., & Biernat, M. (2003). Family values and antipathy toward gay men. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 833—847.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Yardley, W. (2005, March 7). In Connecticut, shifting ground on gay civil unions. New York Times, p. B5.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
