|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
No Shelter for Singles: The Perceived Legitimacy of Marital Status Discrimination
Wendy L. Morris
McDaniel College, wmorris{at}mcdaniel.edu
Stacey Sinclair
University of Virginia
Bella M. DePaulo
University of California, Santa Barbara
Providing the first empirical evidence of discrimination against singles, participants in multiple experiments favored married couples over various types of singles and failed to recognize such differential treatment as discrimination. In four experiments, undergraduates and rental agents read descriptions of multiple applicants for a rental property and chose one. The applicant pool, varying across experiments, included a married couple and different types of singles. Although the applicants were similar on substantive dimensions, participants consistently chose the married couple over the singles and explicitly stated that the applicants' marital status influenced their choice. In Experiment 5, participants read examples of housing discrimination against singles and other more recognized stigmatized groups. Participants rated discrimination against singles as more legitimate than discrimination against virtually all of the other groups.
Key Words: discrimination • housing • legitimacy • marital status • singles
References
- Antonovics, K., & Town, R. (2004). Are all the good men married? Uncovering the sources of the marital wage premium. American Economic Review, 94, 317—321.
- Bellas, M. (1992). The effects of marital status and wives' employment on the salaries of faculty men: The (house) wife bonus. Gender & Society, 6, 609—622.[Abstract]
- Budig, M.J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 662, 204—225.
- Burkett, E. (2000). The baby boon: How family-friendly America cheats the childless. New York: Free Press.
- Byrne, A., & Carr, D. (2005). Caught in the cultural lag: The stigma of singlehood. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 84—141.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
- Conley, T.D., & Collins, B.E. (2002). Gender, relationship status, and stereotyping about sexual risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1483—1494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Conlin, M. (2003, October 20). Unmarried America. Business Week, 106—116.
- Couple: Unmarrieds are treated unfairly. (2000, June 27). The Daily Progress.
- Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371—386.[Abstract]
- Davis, A.G., & Strong, P.M. (1977). Working without a net: The bachelor as a social problem. Sociological Review, 25, 109—129.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- DePaulo, B. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after. New York: St. Martin's Press.
- DePaulo, B.M., & Morris, W.L. (2001). Undergraduate students' views on marriage and singlehood. Unpublished raw data.
- DePaulo, B.M., & Morris, W.L. (2005a). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57—83.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- DePaulo, B.M., & Morris, W.L. (2005b). Should singles and the scholars who study them make their mark or stay in their place? Psychological Inquiry, 16, 142—149.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- DePaulo, B.M., & Morris, W.L. (2006). The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science,15, 251—254.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Etaugh, C., & Birdoes, L.N. (1991). Effects of age, sex, and marital status on person perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 491—497.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Hertel, J., Schütz, A., DePaulo, B.M., Morris, W.L., & Stucke, T.S. (in press). She's single, so what? How are singles perceived compared to people who are married? Journal of Family Research.
- Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B.A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881—920.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Keith, P.M. (1986). The social context and resources of the unmarried in old age. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 23, 81—96.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Major, B., Quinton, W.J., & McCoy, S.K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 34. (pp. 251—330). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Millbank, J. (1997). Every sperm is sacred? Denying women access to fertility services on the basis of sexuality or marital status. Alternative Law Journal, 22, 126—129.
- Morris, W.L. (2005). The effect of stigma awareness on the self-esteem of singles. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 2005). Dissertion Abstracts International, 66(3), 1785B.
- Morris, W.L., DePaulo, B.M., Hertel, J., & Taylor, L.C. (in press). Singlism—Another problem that has no name: Prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination against singles. In T. G. Morrison & M. A. Morrison (Eds), The psychology of modern prejudice. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
- Morris, W.L., Sinclair, S., & DePaulo, B.M. (2005). [Does the perceived controllability over marital status influence how discrimination against singles is perceived?]. Unpublished raw data.
- Motro, S. (2004, January 25). The state of the unions: Single and paying for it. New York Times, p. 15.
- Neugarten, B.L. (1976). Adaptation and the life cycle. Counseling Psychologist, 6, 16—20.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- North Dakota Fair Housing Council Press Release (2000, November 13). Housing discrimination case to be heard by the North Dakota Supreme Court. Retrieved from http://www.ndfhc.org/newsletters_and_press/releases/release_11-13-2000.htm.
- Ritter, L.C. (2003). Implicit attitudes about married and single people. Unpublished senior thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
- Rodin, M., Price, J., Sanchez, F., & McElligot, S. (1989). Derogation, exclusion, and unfair treatment of persons with social flaws: Controllability of stigma and the attribution of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 439—451.[Abstract]
- Schoen, R., & Canudas-Romo, V. (2006). Timing effects on divorce: 20th century experience in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 749—758.[CrossRef]
- Toutkoushian, R.K. (1998). Racial and marital status differences in faculty pay. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 513—529.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Unmarried America (2000, December 6). Michigan court says landlords can refuse to rent to unmarried couples. U.S. News Archive. Retrieved June 16, 2005 from http://www.unmarriedamerica.com/members/news/2000/usnarch/usnewsarchive-12012000-12062000.htm.
- Unmarried America. (n.d.). Marital statutes prohibiting marital status discrimination in employment. Retrieved June 16, 2005 from http://www.singlesrights.com/ms-employment-laws.htm.
- Unmarried America (n.d.). Some laws affecting single people. Retrieved June 16, 2005 from http://www.unmarriedamerica.org/lawsaffecting.html.
- US Census Bureau, 2005. American community survey.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 10, No. 4,
457-470 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207081535
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. H. Wirth and K. D. Williams
`They Don't Like Our Kind': Consequences of Being Ostracized While Possessing a Group Membership
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
January 1, 2009;
12(1):
111 - 127.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
