Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stone, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Crisp, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 10, No. 4, 493-513 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207081537
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Superordinate and Subgroup Identification as Predictors of Intergroup Evaluation in Common Ingroup Contexts

Catriona H. Stone

University of Exeter

Richard J. Crisp

University of Kent, r.crisp{at}kent.ac.uk

We examined the combined effects of subgroup and superordinate group identification on intergroup evaluations within common ingroup identity contexts. In Studies 1 and 2 we observed a positive correlation between subgroup identification and intergroup bias, and a negative correlation between superordinate identification and bias. In Study 3 we replicated these effects using alternative measures and observed a common path underlying these relationships: the perceived psychological distance between the self and outgroup. In Studies 4 and 5 we replicated this path model and found that the relationship between superordinate identification and intergroup bias was contingent upon making the superordinate identity salient, but this was not the case for subgroup identification. We discuss the findings in the context of theoretical and applied development of the Common Ingroup Identity Model.

Key Words: common ingroup identity • distinctiveness threat • identification

References

  • Arbuckle, J., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4 user's reference guide. Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation.
  • Arends-Toth, J., & van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 249—266.
  • Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001). Perceived threat and Israeli Jews' evaluations of Russian immigrants: The moderating role of Jewish and Israeli identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 691—704.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Branscombe, N.R., Wann, D.L., Noel, J.G., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 381—388.
  • Brewer, M.B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Brown, R.J., & Abrams, D. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78—92.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Crisp, R.J., & Beck, S.R. (2005). Reducing intergroup bias: The moderating role of ingroup identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 173—185.[Abstract]
  • Crisp, R.J., Stone, C.H., & Hall, N.R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification. Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 32, 230—243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60—67.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., Isen, A.M., & Lowrance, R. (1995). Group representations and intergroup bias: Positive affect, similarity and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 856—865.[Abstract]
  • Dovidio, J.F., ten Vergert, M., Stewart, T.L., Gaertner, S.L., Johnson, J.D., Esses et al. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537—1549.[Abstract]
  • Gaertner, S.L., & Dovidio, J.F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Anastasio, P.A., Bachman, B.A., & Rust, M.C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 247—278). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Rust, M.C., Nier, J., Banker, B.S., Ward, C.M. et al. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388—402.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Gaertner, S.L., Mann, J.A., Dovidio, J.F., Murrell, A.J., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692—704.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Gaertner, S.L., Mann, J.A., Murrell, A.J., & Dovidio, J.F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239—249.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Gaertner, S.L., Rust, M.C., Dovidio, J.F., Bachman, B.A., & Anastasio, P.A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Groups Research, 25, 224—249.[CrossRef]
  • González, R., & Brown, R.J. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195—214.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Hogg, M.A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223—255.[CrossRef]
  • Hogg, M.A. (2001). Self-categorization and subjective uncertainty resolution: Cognitive and motivational facets of social identity and group membership. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & L. Wheeler (Eds.), The social mind: Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior (pp. 323—349). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hornsey, M.J., & Hogg, M.A. (2000a). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143—156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hornsey, M.J., & Hogg, M.A. (2000b). Intergroup similarity and subgroup relations: Some implications for assimilation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 948—958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hornsey, M.J., & Hogg, M.A. (2000c). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242—256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hornstein, H.A. (1976). Cruelty and kindness: A new look at aggression and altruism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Huo, Y.J., Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40—45.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Jetten, J., Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B.M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 130—140.[Abstract]
  • Jetten, J., & Spears, R. (2003). The divisive potential of differences and similarities: The role of intergroup distinctiveness in intergroup differentiation. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 203—241.[CrossRef]
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222—1233.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2001). Similarity as a source of differentiation: The role of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 621—640.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862—879.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443—453.[Abstract]
  • Lipponen, J., Helkama, K., & Juslin, M. (2003). Subgroup identification, superordinate identification and intergroup bias between the subgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 239—250.[Abstract]
  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302—318.[Abstract]
  • Medrano, J.D. (2003). Framing Europe: Attitudes to European integration in Spain, Germany and the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Mlicki, P.P., & Ellemers, N. (1996). Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 97—114.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oakes, P.J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117—141). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Roccas, S., & Schwartz, S.H. (1993). Effects of intergroup similarity on intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 581—595.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Rutland, A., & Cinnirella, M. (2000). Context effects on Scottish national and European self-categorization: The importance of category accessibility, fragility and relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 495—519.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538—553.[Abstract]
  • Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Scheepers, D. (2002). Distinctiveness threat and the definition of collective self: A tripartite model. In A. Tesser, J.V. Wood, & D.A. Stapel (Eds.), Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 147—171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1—39.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  • Turner, J.C., Brown, R.J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187—204.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • van Knippenberg, D., & van Leeuwen, E. (2001). Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to postmerger identification. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 249—264). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • van Leeuwen, E., van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 679—690.[CrossRef]
  • Wittig, M.A., & Molina, L. (2000). Moderators and mediators of prejudice reduction. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 295—318). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wright, S.C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S.A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73—90.[CrossRef][ISI]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stone, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Crisp, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?