Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riketta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sacramento, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 11, No. 1, 115-131 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207084849
© 2008 SAGE Publications

`They Cooperate With Us, So They Are Like Me': Perceived Intergroup Relationship Moderates Projection from Self to Outgroups

Michael Riketta

Aston University, m.riketta{at}aston.ac.uk

Claudia A. Sacramento

Aston University

Whereas projection of self-attributes to ingroups is ubiquitous, projection of self-attributes to outgroups (outgroup projection) is an elusive phenomenon. Two experiments examined the moderating effect of perceived intergroup relationship on outgroup projection and explored underlying mechanisms. Perceived cooperation versus competition between ingroup and outgroup was manipulated using fictitious (Experiment 1) or natural groups (Experiment 2). In both experiments, participants judged the outgroup as more similar to the self in the cooperation condition than in the competition condition. This effect was independent of recategorization, perceived intergroup similarity, and ingroup-to-outgroup projection. These studies demonstrate the very existence of outgroup projection and extend previous work on moderators of projection from self to groups.

Key Words: common ingroup identity • intergroup conflict • multilevel analysis • social categorization • social identification • social projection

References

  • Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Alexander, M.G., Brewer, M.B., & Herrmann, R.K. (1999). Images and affect: A functional analysis of outgroup stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 78—93.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Ames, D.R. (2004a). Inside the mind reader's tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340—353.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ames, D.R. (2004b). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573—585.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator—mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173—1182.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Cadinu, M.R., & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661—677.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Clement, R.W., & Krueger, J. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219—233.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Anastasio, P.A., Bachman, B.A., & Rust, M.C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1—26). London: Wiley.
  • Gramzow, R.H., Gaertner, L., & Sedikides, C. (2001). Memory for ingroup and outgroup information in a minimal group context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 188—205.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Rudman, L.A., Farnham, S.D., Nosek, B.A., & Mellott, D.S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3—25.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hager, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (Eds.) (1994). Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen [Handbook of German word norms]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
  • Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575—604.
  • Hofmann, D.A., & Gavin, M.B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623—641.[Abstract]
  • Jones, P.E. (2004). False consensus in social context: Differential projection and perceived social distance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 417—429.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Katz, D., & Allport, F. (1931). Students' attitudes. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman.
  • Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J.W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
  • Krueger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus Advances in Experimental Social Pschology, 30, 163—240.
  • Krueger, J. (2000). The projective perception of the social world. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison (pp. 323—351). New York: Kluwer.
  • Krueger, J., & Zeiger, J.S. (1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670—680.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Mullen, B., Atkins, J.L., Champion, D.S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J.E. et al. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262—283[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Mullen, B., Dovidio, J.F., Johnson, C., & Copper, C. (1992). Ingroup—outgroup differences in social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 422—440.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Muller, D., Judd, C.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852—863.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Otten, S. (2002) `Me' and `us' or `us' and `them'? The self as heuristic for defining novel ingroups. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 1—33.[CrossRef]
  • Otten, S., & Wentura, D. (2001). Self-anchoring and ingroup favoritism: An individual-profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 1049—1071.
  • Pettigrew, T.F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65—85.
  • Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, T., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6 hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling (computer program). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Riketta, M. (2005). Cognitive differentiation between self, ingroup, and outgroup: The roles of identification and perceived intergroup conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 97—106.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Riketta, M. (2006). Projection of self-attributes to outgroups. In A. B. Prescott (Ed.), The concept of self in psychology (pp. 215—241). Hauppauge, NY: Nova.
  • Robbins, J.M., & Krueger, J. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32—47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R., & Sherif, C.W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
  • Sherman, S.J., Chassin, L., Clark, C.P., & Agostinelli, G. (1984). The role of evaluation and similarity principles in the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1244—1262.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Smith, E.R., & Henry, S. (1996). An ingroup becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635—642.[Abstract]
  • Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1990). Consensus estimation in social context. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 81—109.
  • Turner, J.C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell, (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 42—67). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riketta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sacramento, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?