This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Holtz, R. Articles by Nihiser, T. H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Relative Deprivation, Attitude Contrast Projection, and Opinion Certainty

Ball State University, rfholtz{at}bsu.edu

Tañja H. Nihiser

Ohio State University at Lima

This research examines social projection between relatively deprived groups and its effect on opinion certainty. In Study 1, disadvantaged and advantaged group members indicated their own attitudes on six issues, and then estimated the positions either of their in-group, their respective rival out-group, a control out-group, or they received no opportunity to project. As expected, disadvantaged participants projected attitudinal contrast onto their advantaged rival out-group. Negative thoughts about the rival mediated subsequent increments in opinion certainty. Alternatively, advantaged participants assumed moderate consensus with their disadvantaged rival. They also exhibited ambivalent out-group thoughts and low opinion certainty. Study 2 replicated the effect of disadvantaged status on contrast projection and opinion certainty. Discussion focuses on the different perspectives of relatively deprived groups.

Key Words: ambivalence • attitudes • attitude strength • intergroup relations • relative deprivation • social projection

References

• Abelson, R.P. (1995). Attitude extremity. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 25—41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Alexander, M.G., Brewer, M.B., & Herrmann, R.K. (1999). Images and affect: A functional analysis of out-group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 78—93.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator—mediator variable distinction in Social Psychological research: Conceptual, Strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173 —1182[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bizman, A., Yinon, Y., & Vizgardiski, N. (1993). False consensus among middle-eastern and western Israeli students. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 539—546.[ISI]
• Board reviews election. (1993, November 4). The Times-Bulletin, p. A1.
• Bodenhausen, G.V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13—37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Branthwaite, A., Doyle, S., & Lightbown, N. (1979). The balance between fairness and discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 149—163.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309—342). New York: Guilford.
• Campbell, D.T. (1967). Stereotypes and perception of group differences. American Psychologist, 22, 817—829.[CrossRef]
• Clement, R.W., & Krueger, J. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219—231.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Crestview considers new school (1990, January 10). The Times-Bulletin, p. A3.
• Crocker, J., & Blanton, H. (1999). Social inequality and self-esteem: The moderating effects of social comparison, legitimacy, and contingencies of self-esteem. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the self (pp. 171—191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egotistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 84—113.
• Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Dion, K.L. (1975). Women's reactions to discrimination from members of the same or opposite sex. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 294—306.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect:
• The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 57—76.
• Duckitt, J., & Mphuthing, T. (2002). Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes: South Africa before and after the Transition. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 69—90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Fiske, S.T., & Ruscher, J.R. (1993). Negative interdependence and prejudice: Whence the affect? In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 239—268). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Folger, R. (1992). On wanting what we do not have. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 123—133.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Grant, P.R. (1993). Ethnocentrism in response to a threat to social identity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 143—154.[ISI]
• Grant, P.R., & Brown, R. (1995). From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 195—211.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Henry, K.B., Arrow, H., & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558—581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In M. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
• Holtz, R. (2003). Intragroup or intergroup attitude projection can increase opinion certainty: Is there classism at college? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1922—1944.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Holtz, R. (2004). Group cohesion, attitude projection, and opinion certainty: Beyond interaction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 112—125.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1985). Assumed similarity and opinion certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 890—898.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (2001). Intergroup competition, attitudinal projection, and opinion certainty: Capitalizing on conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 61—73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Islam, M.R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936—950.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Jackman, M.R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Katz, I. (1981). Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Kramer, R.M., & Jost, J.T. (2002). Close encounters of the suspicious kind: Out-group paranoia in hierarchical trust dilemmas. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.). From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 173—189). New York: Psychology Press.
• Kramer, R.M., & Messick, D.M. (1998). Getting by with a little help from our enemies: Collective paranoia and its role in intergroup relations. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 233—255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Krueger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp 163—240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Kunda, Z., Davies, P.G., Adams, B.D., & Spencer, S.J. (2002). The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, & resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 283—299.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S.J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522—544.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Leach, C.W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). `Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate': The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136—163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Lindman, H.R. (1974). Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs. Oxford, UK: W. H. Freeman.
• Mackie, D.M., & Smith, E.R. (2002). Beyond prejudice: Moving from positive and negative evaluations to differentiated reactions to social groups. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 1—12). New York: Psychology Press.
• Major, B. (1994). From social inequity to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293—355.[ISI]
• Major, B., Gramzow, R.H., McCoy, S.K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269—282.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Major, B., Testa, M., & Bylsma, W.H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237—260). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Many in district want better schools. (1994, December 2). The Times-Bulletin, pp. A1,A3.
• Mark, M.M., & Folger, R. (1984). Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 192—218.
• McGarty, C., Yzerbyt, V., & Spears, R. (2002). Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Mikula, G., Scherer, K.R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769—783.[Abstract]
• Miller, D.T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527—553.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313—344.[CrossRef]
• Nemeth, C., & Wachtler, J. (1974). Creating the perceptions of consistency and confidence: A necessary condition for minority influence. Sociometry, 37, 529—540.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Pemberton, M.B., Insko, C.A., & Schopler, J. (1996). Memory for and experience of differential competitive behavior of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 953—966.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Rouhana, N.N., O'Dwyer, A., & Vaso, S.K.M. (1997). Cognitive biases and political party affiliation in intergroup conflict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 37—57.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Runciman, W.G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R.Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415—434.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Smith, H.J., & Ortiz, D.J. (2002). Is it just me? The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 91—115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1989). The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 101—121.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1990). Consensus estimation in social context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 81—109). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
• Staub, E. (2001). Individual and group identities in genocide and mass killing. In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder, (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 159—184). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157—175.[ISI]
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7—24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98—123.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Tougas, F., & Beaton, A.M. (2002). Personal and group relative deprivation: Connecting the `I' to the `we.' In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 119—135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1990). The response of men to affirmative action strategies for women: The study of a predictive model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 424—432.[CrossRef]
• Tyler, T.R., & Smith, H.J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th edition, Vol. 2, pp. 595—629). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• United States Census (2000). U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
• Van Knippenberg, A., & van Oers, H. (1984). Social identity and equity concerns in intergroup perceptions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 351—361.[ISI]
• Voters pass school levy (2001, November 7). The Times-Bulletin, p. A1.
• Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J.L., Insko, C.A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual— intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698—722.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Wright, S.C., & Tropp, L.R. (2002). Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 200—236). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20—50). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Holtz, R. Articles by Nihiser, T. H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?