Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedland, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nadler, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 2, No. 1, 79-93 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430299021006
© 1999 SAGE Publications

Intuitive Economists in a Social Environment: A Reexamination of the Effect of Interaction Outcomes on Interdependent Behavior

Nehemia Friedland

Tel Aviv University, nehemia{at}post.tau.ac.il

Arie Nadler

Tel Aviv University

This study examined the proposition that interdependent behavior is related to two independent utility functions. Nonsocial utility is a measure of the intrinsic worth of rewards, which is unrelated to the circumstances of their attainment. Hence, it primarily affects individualistic choices. Social utility expresses the effect of interaction outcomes on the recipient's self-esteem, and, therefore, it underlies competitiveness. Social comparison models suggest that social utility is sensitive to the proximity between interacting parties. Three Maximizing Difference Game experiments showed that, given low nonsocial utility outcomes, high social proximity increased participants' attention to the outcomes of the other player as well as the frequency of competitive choices. High nonsocial utility outcomes strengthened individualistic behavior, and reversed the effect of proximity on competitiveness. This reversal was attributed to normative concerns that were predicted to become salient when the social and nonsocial utilities of interaction outcomes are both high.

Key Words: competition • cooperation • interdependence

References

  • Abric, J. C. (1982). Cognitive processes underlying cooperation: The theory of social representation. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grezlak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior (pp. 73-94). New York: Academic Press.
  • Alexander, C. N., Jr., & Weil, H. G. (1969). Players, persons and purposes: Situational meaning and the prisoner's dilemma game. Sociometry, 32, 121-144.[CrossRef]
  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Brickman, P., & Bulman, R. J. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 149-186). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993a). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993b). Communal and exchange relations: What it is and is not, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684-691.[Abstract]
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Lualhati, J. C., & McCusker, C. (1994). Effects of gain-loss frames on satisfaction with self-other outcome-differences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 497-510.
  • Eiser, J. R., & Bhavnani, K. K. (1974). The effect of situational meaning on the behaviour of subjects in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 93-97.
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.[CrossRef]
  • Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 77-94). New York: Plenum.
  • Gallo, P. S., Jr., & Sheposh, J. (1969). Effects of incentive magnitude on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 239-244.[CrossRef]
  • Grezlak, J. L. (1978). Konflikt intersow [Conflict of interests]. Warsaw: Panstowowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Grezlak, J. L., Poppe, M., Czwartosz, Z., & Nowak, A. (1988). 'Numerical trap'. A new look at outcome representation in studies on choice behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 143-159.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Griesinger, D. W., & Livingston, J. W., Jr. (1973). Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behavioral Science, 18, 173-188.
  • Hewstone, M., Argyle, M., & Furnham, A. (1982). Favouritism, fairness and joint profit in long-term relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 283-295.
  • Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
  • Knight, G. P., & Chao, C. C. (1991). Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic social values among 8-to 12-years-old siblings, friends, and acquaintances. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 201-211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kramer, R. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1057.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kuhlman, D. M., Camac, C. R., & Cunha, D. A. (1986). Individual differences in social orientation. In H. Wilke, D. Messick, & C. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 151-174). Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang.
  • MacCrimmon, K. R., & Messick, D. M. (1976). A framework for social motives. Behavioral Science, 21, 86-100.
  • McClintock, C. G. (1972). Game behavior and social motivation in interpersonal settings. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 271-297). New York: Holt.
  • McClintock, C. G., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1988). Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 396-409.[CrossRef]
  • McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. P. (1966a). Reward and score feedback as determinants of cooperative and competitive game behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 606-613.[CrossRef]
  • McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. P. (1966b). Cross cultural comparisons of interpersonal motives. Sociometry, 29, 406-427.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
  • Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1985). Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 389-399.
  • Mettee, D. R., & Smith, G. (1977). Social comparison and interpersonal attraction: The case of dissimilarity. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 69-101). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Nadler, A., & Fisher, J. D. (1986). The role of threat to self-esteem and perceived control in recipient reaction to help: Theory development and empirical validation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 81-122). New York: Academic Press.
  • Nadler, A., Jazwinski, C., Lau, S., & Miller, A. (1980). The cold glow of success: Responses to social rejection as affected by attitude similarity between chosen and rejected individuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 279-289.
  • Ng, S. H. (1981). Equity theory and the allocation of rewards between groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 439-444.
  • Oskamp, S., & Kleinke, C. (1970). Amount of reward as a variable in a prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 133-140.
  • Pate, J. L., & Broughton, E. (1970). Game-playing behavior as a function of incentive. Psychological Reports, 27, 36.
  • Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Tesser, A. (1980). Self-esteem maintenance in family dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 77-91.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Tesser, A., & Smith, J. (1980). Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don't always help the one you like. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 582-590.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 297-332). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Tetlock, P. E. (1991). An alternative metaphor in the study of judgment and choice: People as politicians. Theory and Psychology, 1, 451-475.
  • Tumer, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: The test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Wilder, D. A. (1986). Social categorization: Implications for creation and reduction of intergroup bias. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 291-355). New York: Academic Press.
  • Yamagishi, T., & Sato, K. (1986). Motivational bases of the public goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 67-73.[CrossRef][ISI]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedland, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nadler, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?