Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, H.
Right arrow Articles by Vries, N. d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 2, No. 3, 259-278 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430299023004
© 1999 SAGE Publications

The Asymmetrical Perception of Men and Women

Heather Young

TNO-Human Factors Research Institute and University of Nijmegen, young{at}tm.tno.nl

Ad van Knippenberg

University of Nijmegen

Naomi Ellemers

University of Leiden

Nanne de Vries

University of Amsterdam

This study examines the individuation versus categorization of men and women. Several researchers have argued for structural status differences between men and women - men occupy societal positions of high status, and women positions of low status. This line of research predicts that male participants will individuate other men, but categorize women. Conversely, female participants will individuate men as well as women. In the present study, male and female participants were presented with eight stimulus persons, four men and four women, each described by four attributes. In addition, stimulus-category fit was manipulated such that the attributes were either stereotypical of the gender group they described or gender neutral. Information clustering in free recall and name-matching were main dependent measures. The results support the hypotheses and are discussed in terms of status differentials and contemporary theories of person perception.

Key Words: categorization • gender perceptions • group status • information • clustering

References

  • Basow, S. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes: Traditions and alternatives (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Branscombe, N. R. (1998) Thinking about one's gender group's privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167-184.
  • Branscombe, N. R., Deaux, K., & Lerner, M. S. (1985). Individual differences and the influence of context on categorization and prejudice. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 15, 25-35.
  • Burris, C. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (1997). Maladjustment implications of self and group gender-role discrepancies: An ordered-discrepancy model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 75-95.
  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 69, 608-630.
  • Deaux, K., Kite, M. E., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Clustering and gender schemata: An uncertain link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 387-397.[Abstract]
  • Eagly, A. H., & Chrvala, C. (1986). Sex differences in conformity: Status and gender role interpretations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 203-220.[CrossRef]
  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915-928.[CrossRef]
  • Echabe, A. E. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Status and values. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 3, 559-574.
  • Ellemers, N. (1993) Sociale identiteit en sekse: Het dilemma van succesvolle vrouwen [Social identity and gender: The dilemma of successful women]. Tijdschrift voor Vrouwenstudies, 14, 322-336.
  • Ellemers, N. (1995). Psychologie: Tussen `vrouwenstudie' en `mannenvak'. [Psychology: Between women's major subject and men's profession]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 50, 224-230.
  • Erber, R., & Fiske, S. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709-726.[CrossRef]
  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fiske, S. T., Morling, B., & Stevens, L. E. (1996). Controlling self and others: A theory of anxiety, mental control and social control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 115-123.[Abstract]
  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hamilton, D. L., Driscoll, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Cognitive organization of impressions: Effects of incongruency in complex representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 925-939.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hastie, R. (1980). Memory for information which confirms or contradicts a general impression. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception (pp. 155-177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.
  • Horwitz, M., & Rabbie, J. M. (1982). Individuality and membership in the intergroup system. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 241-274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). They all look alike, but so do we... sometimes: Perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity as a function of sex and context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 111-124.[ISI]
  • Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Eagly, A. H., & Stewart, T. L. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193-217.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Differential recall of subcategory information about in-group and out-group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 401-413.[Abstract]
  • McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). On-line and memory-based aspects of individual and group target judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 173-185.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P.J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Ostrom, T. M., Carpenter, S. L., Sedikides, C., & Li, F. (1993). Differential processing of in-group and out-group information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 21-34.
  • Park, B., DeKay, M. L., & Kraus, S. (1994). Aggregating social behavior into person models: Perceiver-induced consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 437-459.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 421051-1068.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45-48.[CrossRef]
  • Sedikides, C. (1997). Differential processing of ingroup and outgroup information: The role of relative group status in permeable boundary groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 121-144.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Simon, B., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 699-711.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Smith, E. R., & Zarate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3-21.
  • Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440-463.[CrossRef]
  • Srull, T. K. (1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 2-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Srull, T. K., Lichtenstein, M., & Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 316-345.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N., & Ruderman, A. (1978). The categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.[CrossRef]
  • Touhey, J. C. (1974a). Effects of additional women professionals on ratings of occupational prestige and desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 86-89.[CrossRef]
  • Touhey, J. C. (1974b). Effects of additional men on prestige and desirability of occupations typically performed by women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 330-335.
  • van Knippenberg, A., van Twuyver, M., & Pepels, J. (1994). Factors affecting social categorization processes in memory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 419-431.
  • van Knippenberg, D., Blaauw, B., & Vermunt, R. (1996) [Asymmetries in intergroup perceptions: Ingroup bias and the outgroup homogeneity effect among inmates and guards in a US jail]. Unpublished raw data.
  • van Twuyver, M. (1996). Factors affecting social categoization processes in memory. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van Twuyver, M., & van Knippenberg, A. (1992). De perceptie van attitudes van `ingroup' en `outgroup' leden [The perception of in-group and out-group members' attitudes]. Fundamentele Sociale Psychologie, 6, 25-45.
  • Vonk, R., & Ellemers, N. (1993). De invloed van sekse-stereotypen op oordelen over mannen en vrouwen [The influence of gender stereotypes on judgments of men and women]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 48, 213-225.
  • Vonk, R., & van Knippenberg, A. (1995). Processing attitudes from ingroup and outgroup members: Effects of within-group and within-person inconsistencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 215-227.[CrossRef]
  • Wilder, D. A. (1990). Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and out-groups: Organization of information and attribution of independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1202-1213.[CrossRef]
  • Wyer, R. S., & Gordon, S. E. (1982). The recall of information about persons and groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 128-164.
  • Young, H., van Knippenberg, A., Ellemers, N., & De Vries, N. (1994). [Information organization as a function of presentation format]. Unpublished raw data.
  • Young, H., van Knippenberg, A., Ellemers, N., & De Vries, N. (1997). The effects of group membership and social context on information organization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 523-537.[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Hewstone, R. J. Crisp, A. Contarello, A. Voci, L. Conway, G. Marletta, and H. Willis
Tokens in the Tower: Perceptual Processes and Interaction Dynamics in Academic Settings with 'Skewed', 'Tilted' and 'Balanced' Sex Ratios
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 509 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, H.
Right arrow Articles by Vries, N. d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?