This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walker, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Effects of Personal and Group Relative Deprivation on Personal and Collective Self-Esteem

Murdoch University, walker{at}central.murdoch.edu.au

The theory of relative deprivation (RD) distinguishes between personal and group RD, and links the two to personal and group identity. Models linking RD and identity suggest that identity causally precedes RD. These models are extended in the present study to allow for causal effects of RD on personal and group esteem. An experiment is reported which was designed to examine the causal effects of personal and group RD on personal self-esteem and collective self-esteem. It was predicted that experiencing personal RD would lower personal self-esteem but would not affect collective self-esteem, and, conversely, that experiencing group RD would lower collective self-esteem but would not affect personal self-esteem. The results of a 2 (sex of subject) X 2 (sex of others in group: either 3 males or 3 females) X 2 (reward condition: fair or unfair) experiment supported this prediction for personal self-esteem, but only partially supported the prediction for collective self-esteem. The implications of the results for understanding the failure of RD to translate into action, and the usefulness of the experimental paradigm for inducing personal or group RD are briefly discussed.

Key Words: collective self-esteem • relative deprivation • self-esteem

References

• Abeles, R. P. (1976). Relative deprivation, rising expectations, and black militancy. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 119-137.
• Abrams, D. (1990). Political identity: Relative deprivation, social identity, and the case of Scottish nationalism (ESRC 16-19 Initiative Occasional Paper No. 24). London: Social Statistics Research Unit, City University.
• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journnal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
• Baumeister, R. (Ed.) (1993). Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum.
• Baumeister, R. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 680-740). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
• Beaton, A. M., & Tougas, F. (1997). The representation of women in management: The more, the merrier?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 773-782.[Abstract]
• Birt, C. M., & Dion, K. L. (1987). Relative deprivation theory and responses to discrimination in a gay male and lesbian sample. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 139-145.
• Clayton, S. D., & Crosby, F. J. (1992).Justice, gender, and affirmative action. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Crocker, J., Blaine, B., & Luhtanen, R. (1993). Prejudice, intergroup behaviour and self-esteem: Enhancement and protection motives. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 52-67). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
• Crocker, J.; & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60-67.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Crosby, F. J., Pufall, A., Snyder, R. C., O'Connell, M.,. & Whalen, P. (1989). The denial of personal disadvantage among you, me, and all the other ostriches. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 79-99). New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Dube, L., & Guimond, S. (1986). Relative deprivation and social protest: The personal-group issue. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 201-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of sociocultural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57.
• Ellemers, N. (in press). Social identity and relative deprivation. In I. Walker & H.J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Fleming, J. S., & Courteney, B. E. (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem: II, Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 404-421.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Fleming, J. S., & Watts, W. A. (1980). The dimensionality of self-esteem: Some results from a college sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 921-929.[CrossRef]
• Guimond, S., & Dube-Simard, L. (1983). Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec Nationalist Movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 526-535.[CrossRef]
• Hafer, C. L., & Olson, J. M. (1993). Beliefs in a just world, discontent, and assertive actions by working women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 30-38.[Abstract]
• Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.
• Long, K. M., & Spears, R. (1997). The self-esteem hypothesis revisited: Differentiation and the disaffected. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 296-317). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's own social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.[Abstract]
• Major, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 345-370). New York: Academic Press.
• Olson, J. M., & Hafer, C. L. (1996). Affect, motivation, and cognition in relative deprivation research. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 85-117). New York: Guilford.
• Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., Meen, J., & Robertson, D. J. (1995). The preconditions and consequences of relative deprivation: Two field studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 944-964.[CrossRef]
• Petta, G., & Walker, I. (1992). Relative deprivation and ethnic identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 285-293.
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1967). Social evaluation theory. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 241-311). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
• Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1985). A manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scales. London: H. K. Lewis.
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 40-62.
• Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretation. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.[Free Full Text]
• Smith, H. J., & Ortiz, D. (in press). Is it just me?: The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Smith, H. J., Spears, R., & Oyen, M. (1994). 'People like us:' The influence of personal deprivation and group membership salience on justice evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 277-299.[CrossRef]
• Suls, J., & Wills, T. A. (Eds.) (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-40.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
• Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254-262.[Abstract]
• Tougas, F., & Beaton, A. M. (in press). Relative deprivation: The personal and the collective. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Tougas, F., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1990). L'appui des femmes a l'action positive: Une question d'image ou de colere?Science et Comportement, 20, 211-222.
• Tougas, F., Beaton, A. M., & Veilleux, F. (1991). Why women approve of affirmative action: The study of a predictive model. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 761-776.
• Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1988). The influence of identification, collective relative deprivation, and procedure of implementation on women's response to affirmative action: A causal modeling approach. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 20, 15-28.
• Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1990). The response of men to affirmative action strategies for women: The study of a predictive model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 424-432.
• Tripathi, R. C., & Srivastava, R. (1981). Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 313-318.
• Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 595-629). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
• Van Knippenberg, A., & Ellemers, N. (1993). Strategies in intergroup relations. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 17-32). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
• Vanneman, R. D., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1972). Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race, 13, 461-486.[ISI]
• Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 275-283.[Abstract]
• Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301-310.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Verkuyten and L. Hagendoorn In-Group Favoritism and Self-Esteem: The Role of Identity Level and Trait Valence Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2002; 5(4): 285 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walker, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?