Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brauner, E.
Right arrow Articles by Scholl, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 3, No. 2, 115-122 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430200003002001


Editorial

Editorial: The Information Processing Approach as a Perspective for Groups Research

Elisabeth Brauner

Humboldt-University in Berlin, brauner{at}psy.ch

Wolfgang Scholl

Humboldt-University in Berlin

References

  • Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 7-20.
  • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Brauner, E. (1998). Die Qual der Wahl am Methodenbuffet oder: Wie der Gegenstand nach der passenden Methode sucht [The strenuous choice at the buffet of methods or: How a topic is searching for the right method]. In E. Ardelt- Gattinger, H. Lechner, & W. Schlögl (Eds.), Gruppendynamik. Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der Arbeit in Gruppen (pp. 176-193). Göttingen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.
  • Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33-44.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Davis, J. H. (1996). Small group research and the Steiner question: The once and future thing. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 4-16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Driver, M. J., & Streufert S. (1969). Integrative complexity: An approach to individuals and groups as information-processing systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 272-285.[CrossRef]
  • Fisch, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (1982). Research and publication trends in experimental social psychology: 1971-1980 - A thematic analysis of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, the European Journal of Social Psychology, and the Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 395-412.
  • Fiske, S. T. (1995). Social cognition. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 149-193). New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Galegher, J., Kraut, R. E., & Egidio, C. (1990). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Graumann, C. F. (1955). ‘Social perception’. Die Motivation der Wahrnehmung in neueren amerikanischen Untersuchungen [‘Social perception’. The motivation of perception in new American studies]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 3, 605-661.
  • Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., enlarged version). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Larson, J. R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.[ISI]
  • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1995). Group processes. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 419-465). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • McGrath, J. E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7-27.
  • Miller, J. G. (1960). Information input overload and psychopathology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 695-704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Miller, J. G. (1971). Living systems: The group. Behavioral Science, 16, 302-398.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Moreland, R. L. (1996). Lewin’s legacy for small- groups research. Systems Practice, 9, 7-26.[CrossRef]
  • Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.[CrossRef]
  • Nye, J. L., & Brower, A. M. (Eds.), (1996). What’s social about social cognition: Research on socially shared cognition in small groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Paulus, P. B. (1989). An overview and evaluation of group influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-12). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Sanna, L. J., & Parks, C. D. (1997). Group research trends in social and organizational psychology: Whatever happened to intragroup research?Psychological Science, 8, 261-267.[CrossRef]
  • Simpson, J. A., & Wood, W. (1992). Introduction: Where is the group in social psychology? An historical overview. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp.1-10). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 1467-1478.
  • Steiner, I. D. (1983). Whatever happened to the touted revival of the group? In H. Blumberg, A. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 539-548). New York: Wiley.
  • Steiner, I. D. (1986). Paradigms and groups. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 251-289). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgement of magnitude. Psychological Review, 64, 192-204.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tindale, R. S., & Anderson, E. M. (1998). Small group research and applied social psychology: An introduction. In R. S. Tindale, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. Henderson-King, & J. Myer (Eds.), Social psychological applications to social issues: Theory and research on small groups (Vol. 4, pp. 1-8). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Von Cranach, M., Ochsenbein, G., & Valach, L. (1986). The group as a self-active system: Outline of a theory of group action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 193-229.
  • Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.[ISI]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
D. Abrams and M. A. Hogg
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 10 Years On: Development, Impact and Future Directions
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
G. Randsley de Moura, T. Leader, J. Pelletier, and D. Abrams
Prospects for Group Processes and Intergroup Relations Research: A Review of 70 Years' Progress
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 575 - 596.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brauner, E.
Right arrow Articles by Scholl, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?