Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziegler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 3, No. 2, 141-158 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430200032003

Idea Production in Nominal and Virtual Groups: Does Computer-Mediated Communication Improve Group Brainstorming?

Rene Ziegler

Eberhard-Karls-Universitat Tubingen, Germany, Rene.Ziegler{at}uni-tuebingen.de

Michael Diehl

Eberhard-Karls-Universitat Tubingen, Germany

Gavin Zijlstra

Eberhard-Karls-Universitat Tubingen, Germany

Findings in previous research on the effectiveness of computer brainstorming groups as compared to other kinds of brainstorming groups are equivocal with regard to the quantity and quality of idea production. Nevertheless, using computer-mediated communication is often recommended to enhance idea production in brainstorming groups. This recommendation is based on the assumption that reading others' ideas leads to mutual cognitive stimulation. To test this assumption, two conceptually similar experiments were run comparing two-member and four-member computer brainstorming groups with and without the opportunity to exchange ideas. Although in conditions with computer-mediated communication there should have been three times as much stimulation for individuals in four-member groups as compared to two-member groups, irrespective of group size neither quantity nor quality measures showed any improvement over conditions without computer-mediated communication. Instead, in both experiments, communication led to uniformity tendencies which lowered flexibility of idea production.

Key Words: brainstorming • cognitive stimulation • idea generation

References

  • Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R. L., & Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of one underlying cognitive mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490-503.[Abstract]
  • Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.[CrossRef]
  • Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.[CrossRef]
  • Diehl, M., Ziegler, R., & Nusser, G. (1997). CBS: Ein Computerbrainstorming-Programm zur experimentellen Untersuchung der Ideenproduktion in Gruppen [CBS: A Computer Brainstorming Program for the Experimental Investigation of Idea Production in Groups]. Unpublished manuscript, Universität Tübingen.
  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.[CrossRef]
  • Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 20, pp. 203-253). Newv York: Academic Press.
  • Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming). European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-387.
  • Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.[CrossRef]
  • Mullen, B.,Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-23.
  • Nagasundram, M., & Dennis, A. R. (1993). When a group is not a group: The cognitive foundation of group idea generation. Small Group Research, 24, 463-489.[Abstract]
  • Nunamaker, J. F., Applegate, L. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1987). Facilitating group creativity. Experience with a group decision support system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3, 5-19.
  • Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination (rev. ed.). New York: Scribner.
  • Roy, M. C., Gauvin, S., & Limayem, M. (1996). Electronic group brainstorming: The role of feedback on productivity. Small Group Research, 27, 215-247.[Abstract]
  • Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1998). Inspiring group creativity. Comparing anonymous and identified electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 3-31.[Abstract]
  • Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
  • Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.[CrossRef]
  • Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23, 49-73.[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziegler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?