Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reimer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 4, No. 1, 31-47 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430201041003
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Attributions for Poor Group Performance as a Predictor of Perspective-Taking and Subsequent Group Achievement: A Process Model

Torsten Reimer

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, reim{at}rz.uni-potsdam.de

Several studies on group problem solving have shown that perspective-taking may affect group performance. In this paper, a model is outlined in which the effect of performance attributions on group achievement is assumed to be mediated by the quality of group members' partner spaces (i.e. by their ability to recognize their partners' perspective on a problem). According to the model, the extent to which individuals try to take their partner's perspective is a function of their attributions for poor performance: the more group members attribute negative feedback on performance or disagreement about the correct problem solution to themselves relative to their partners, the more they will try to generate an adequate partner space. Additionally, it is assumed that the quality of the partner spaces has a direct impact on group achievement. These basic assumptions were confirmed by a study in which participants were asked to solve Tower of Hanoi problems in dyads, although attributions themselves did not directly predict achievement.

Key Words: attribution • group problem solving • partner space • Tower of Hanoi

References

  • Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1985). The group attribution error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 563-579.[CrossRef]
  • Ashkanasy, N. M. (1989). Causal attributions and supervisors' response to subordinate performance: The Green and Mitchell model revisited. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 309-330.[CrossRef]
  • Ashkanasy, N. M. (1995). Supervisory attributions and evaluative judgments of subordinate performance: A further test of the Green and Mitchell model. In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Attribution theory: An organizational perspective (pp. 3-6). Delray Beach, FL: St Lucie Press.
  • Bowers, C., Salas, E., Prince, C., & Brannick, M. (1992). Games teams play: A method for investigating team coordination and performance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 503-506.
  • Brehmer, B. (1976). Social judgment theory and the analysis of interpersonal conflict. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 985-1003.[CrossRef]
  • Burns, B. D., & Vollmeyer, R. (1998). Modeling the adversary and success in competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 711-718.
  • Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1998). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Davis, J., & Witte, E. (1996). Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups, (2 Vol.) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Greeno, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning. In R. C. Atkonson, R. J. Herrstein, G. Linzey, & D. R. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 589-672). New York: Wiley.
  • Hirokawa, R. Y. (1990). The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy. Small Group Research, 21, 190-204.[Abstract]
  • Johnston, W. A. (1967). Individual performance and self-evaluation in a simulated team. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 309-328.
  • Karat, J. (1982). A model of problem solving with incomplete constraint knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 538-559.[CrossRef]
  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), The Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 29-38.
  • Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem solving-groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol.1, pp. 126-155), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.[Abstract]
  • Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1985). Reactions to feedback: The role of attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 291-308.
  • Miranda, S. M. (1994). Avoidance of groupthink. Meeting management using group support systems. Small Group Research, 25, 105-136.[Abstract]
  • Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 57-84), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). Problem identification by groups. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 17-47), London: Sage.
  • Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1997). Future research in group support systems: Needs, some questions and possible directions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 357-385.
  • Nye, J. L., & Brower, A. M. (1996). What's social about social cognition?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Okada, T., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 21, 109-146.
  • Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (1993). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ross, M. (1981). Self-centered biases in attributions of responsibility: Antecedents and consequences. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 305-321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322-336.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Rouse, W. B., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 1296-1308.[CrossRef]
  • Salazar, A. J. (1995). Understanding the synergistic effects of communication in small groups. Small Group Research, 26, 169-199.[Abstract]
  • Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 378-386.[CrossRef]
  • Simon, H. A. (1975). The functional equivalence of problem solving skills. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 268-288.[CrossRef]
  • Smith, C. M., Tindale, R. S., & Steiner, L. (1998). Investment decisions by individuals and groups in `sunk cost' situations: The potential impact of shared representations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 175-189.[Abstract]
  • Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Caron, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and group process behavior: What's important for team functioning?Military Psychology, 6, 177-192.[CrossRef]
  • Struthers, C. W., Weiner, B., & Allred, K. (1998). Effects of causal attributions on personnel decisions: A social motivation perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 155-166.
  • Thagard, P. (1992). Adversarial problem solving: Modeling an opponent using explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 16, 123-149.[CrossRef]
  • Tindale, R. S., Heath, L., Edwards, J., Posavac, E. J., Bryant, F. B., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Henderson-King, E., & Myers, J. (1998). Theory and research on small groups. Social psychological applications to social issues (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Tindale, R. S., Kulik, C. T., & Scott, L. A. (1991). Individual and group feedback and performance: An attributional perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 41-62.
  • Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J., & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations and symmetric social influence processes in small groups. In J. Davis & E. Witte (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theory of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer.
  • Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
  • Weiner, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957-965.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
  • Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 307-334.
  • Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1998). The reevaluation of information during group discussion. Group Processes &Intergroup Relations, 1, 21-34.[Abstract]
  • Wittenbaum, G. M., Stasser, G., & Merry, C. J. (1996). Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 129-152.
  • Zaccaro, S. J., Peterson, C., & Walker, S. (1987). Self-serving attributions for individual and group performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 257-263.[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reimer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?