Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holtz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 4, No. 1, 61-73 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430201041005
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Intergroup Competition, Attitudinal Projection, and Opinion Certainty: Capitalizing on Conflict

Rolf Holtz

The Ohio State University at Lima, holtz.21{at}osu.edu

Norman Miller

University of Southern California

Competitive or cooperative relations were imposed between the two experimentally created art discussion groups in each session. Group members indicated their own attitudes and estimated the positions held either by other in-group members or by out-group members in order to assess the effects of target of projection on attitude certainty. As expected, participants assumed greater attitudinal disagreement with competitive compared to cooperative out-groups on the 10 art appreciation issues relevant to their group task. They also assumed more similarity to in-group than to out-group members. Assumed similarity/dissimilarity mediated the effect of projection target on mean increments in attitude certainty, which were greatest in the competitive out-group target condition regardless of issue importance.

Key Words: attitudes • attitude strength • intergroup competition • social projection

References

  • Abelson, R. P. (1988). Conviction. American Psychologist, 43, 267-275.[CrossRef]
  • Abelson, R. P. (1995) Attitude extremity. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 25-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
  • Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1996). Intergroup relations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Weber, J. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268-275.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Blaine, B., & Broadnax, S. (1994). Collective self-esteem and psychological well-being among White, Black, and Asian college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 503-513.[Abstract]
  • Dawes, R. M., Singer, D., & Lemons, F. (1972). An experimental analysis of the contrast effect and its implications for intergroup communication and the indirect assessment of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 281-295.[CrossRef]
  • Eiser, J. R. (1990). Social judgment. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1978). Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 398-408.[CrossRef]
  • Feldman, E. B. (1985). Thinking about art. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.[CrossRef]
  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. L. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common in-group identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Gerard, H. B., & Orive, R. (1987). The dynamics of opinion formation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 171-202). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Granberg, D. (1984). Attributing attitudes to members of groups. In J. R. Eiser (Ed.), Attitudinal judgment (pp. 85-108), New York: Springer.
  • Gross, S. R., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hensley, V., & Duval, S. (1976). Some perceptual determinants of perceived similarity, liking, and correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 159-168.[CrossRef]
  • Hogg, M. A. (1996). Intragroup processes, group structure and social identity. In W.P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 65-93). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173-190). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf/New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249-279). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Holtz, R. (1997). Length of group membership, assumed similarity, and opinion certainty: The dividend for veteran members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 539-555.[CrossRef]
  • Holtz, R. (2000). Intragroup or intergroup attitudinal projection can increase opinion certainty: Is there classism at college? Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Holtz, R., & Branch, T. H. (1999). Intragroup and intergroup attitudinal projection and opinion certainty: Alternative processes.107th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
  • Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1985). Assumed similarity and opinion certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 890-898.[CrossRef]
  • Judd, C. M., & Johnson, J. T. (1984) The polarizing effects of affective intensity. In J. R. Eiser (Ed.), Attitudinal judgment (pp. 65-82). New York: Springer.
  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kenworthy, J. B., & Miller, N. (in press). Perceptual asymmetry in consensus estimates of majority and minority members: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  • Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132-1151.[CrossRef]
  • Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Krueger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 163-240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1996). Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics: Inductive reasoning and social projection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 52-68[CrossRef]
  • Krueger, J., & Zeiger, J. S. (1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670-680.[CrossRef]
  • Lemaine, G. (1974). Social differentiation and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 17-52.
  • Long, K., & Spears, R. (1997) The self-esteem hypothesis revisited: Differentiation and the disaffected. In R. Spears, P.J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 296-317). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
  • Mullen, B., Dovidio, J. F., Johnson, C., & Copper, C. (1992). In-group-out-group differences in social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 422-440.[CrossRef]
  • Pomerantz, E. M., Chaiken, S., & Tordesillas, R. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408-419.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robber's Cave experiment. Norman, OK. Oklahoma Book Exchange.
  • Sherman, S. J., Presson, C. C., Chassin, L., Corty, E., & Olshavsky, R. (1983). The false consensus effect in estimates of smoking prevalence: Underlying mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 197-207[Abstract]
  • Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1990). Consensus estimation in social context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol.1, pp. 81-109), Chichester: Wiley.
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-175.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Tesser, A., Martin, L., & Mendolia, M. (1995). The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 73-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Van Knippenberg, A., Wilke, H., & De Vries, N. K. (1981). Social comparison on two dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 267-283.
  • Wilder, D. A. (1993). The role of anxiety in facilitating stereotypic judgments of out-group behavior. In D. Mackie & D. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 87-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.[CrossRef][ISI]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. Holtz and T. H. Nihiser
Relative Deprivation, Attitude Contrast Projection, and Opinion Certainty
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2008; 11(1): 89 - 114.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. M. Robbins and J. I. Krueger
Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 32 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holtz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?