This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blanton, H. Articles by Crocker, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Contexts of System Justification and System Evaluation: Exploring the Social Comparison Strategies of the (Not Yet) Contented Female Worker

University at Albany, State University of New York, hblanton{at}csc.albany.edu

Greg George

University at Albany, State University of New York

Jennifer Crocker

University of Michigan

Those who are historic targets of discrimination seem surprisingly likely to accept their situation, a phenomenon Jost and Banaji (1994) call system justification. One assumption in system justification theory, however, is that the need to justify builds over time as individuals develop an investment in the system they have implicitly helped to perpetuate. This possibility was tested as it relates to social comparison of pay. An experimental study involving 100 participants (50 men and 50 women) found that women made intragroup comparisons with other women to gauge their satisfaction with a pay rate when it was framed as compensation for past work but they made intergroup comparisons with men to gauge their satisfaction with a pay rate when it was framed as part of an offer for future employment.

Key Words: depressed entitlement • discrimination • equity • social comparison • system justification

References

• Bylsma, W. H., & Major, M. (1992). Two routes to eliminating gender differences in personal entitlement: Social comparisons and performance evaluations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 193-200.
• Bylsma, W. H., & Major, M. (1994). Social comparisons and contentment: Exploring the psychological costs of the gender wage gap. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 241-249.
• Callahan-Levy, C. M. & Messe, L. A. (1979). Sex differences in allocation of pay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 433-446.[CrossRef]
• Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 17, 229-266.
• Crosby, F. (1982) Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Desmarais, S., & Curtis, J. (1999). Gender differences in employment and income experiences among young people. In J. Barling & E. K. Kelloway (Eds.), Young workers: Varieties of experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Dixon, J., & Seron, C. (1995). Stratification in the legal profession: Sex, sector, and salary. Law and Society Review, 29, 381-412.[CrossRef]
• Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., & Good, D. C. (1990). Perceived and actual discrimination in the salaries of male and female managers. Journal of Applied and Social Psychology, 20, 46-67.
• Graham, M. E. & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Gain sharing and women’s and men’s relative pay satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 29 (7), 1027-1042.[CrossRef]
• Hagan, J. (1990). The gender stratification of income inequality among lawyers. Social Forces, 68, 835-855.
• Jaccard, J. (2000). Interaction effects in logistic regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Jost, T. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387-393.
• Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.[ISI]
• Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
• Lunney, G. H. (1970). Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 263-269.
• Major, B. (1987). Gender, justice and the psychology of entitlement. In P. Shaver & C. Hendricks (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 124-148). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-348). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Major, B., & Forcey, B. (1985). Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preferences for same-sex and same-job image comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 393-405.[CrossRef]
• Major, B., McFarlin, D., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399-1412.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Major, B., & Testa, M. (1989). Social comparison processes and judgments of entitlement and satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 101-120.
• Martin, J. (1986). The tolerance of injustice. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 217-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextualist theory of knowledge. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1964). A profile of the Negro American. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Company.
• Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1985). Contrast analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Ruggeiro, K. M., & Taylor, D. M. (1997). Why minority group members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: The role of self-esteem and perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 373-389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Sidanius, J. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. Sniderman & P. E. Tetlock (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blanton, H. Articles by Crocker, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?