This Article Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Knippenberg, D. Articles by Hogg, M. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Editorial: Social Identity Processes in Organizations

University of Amsterdam, ao_vanKnippenberg{at}macmail.psy.uva.nl

Michael A. Hogg

University of Queensland

References

• Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers’ turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1027-1039.[Abstract]
• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 7-20.[Abstract]
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
• Brewer, M. B. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47-68). New York: American Psychological Association.
• Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
• Brown, R. J. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 395-429). London: Academic Press.
• Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
• Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
• Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (in press). Social identity and the link between leadership and followership: How affirming an ingroup identity translates personal vision into group action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
• Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 319-339.[CrossRef]
• Haslam, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Ellemers, N. (Eds.). (in prep.). Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Hogg, M. A. (in press). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
• Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2001). Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309-333.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.[CrossRef]
• Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.[CrossRef]
• Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. English manuscript of ‘La catégorisation sociale’. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la Psychologie Sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272-302). Paris: Larousse.
• Terry, D. J., & Callan, V. J. (1998). In-group bias in response to an organizational merger. Group Dynamics, 2, 67-81.
• Tsui, A., Egan, T., & O’Reilly, C. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246.
• Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups. Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371.[CrossRef]
• van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L., & de Lima, F. (in press). Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology.
• van Knippenberg, D., & van Leeuwen, E. (2001). Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to post-merger identification. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Martin and O. Epitropaki Role of Organizational Identification on Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs), Transformational Leadership and Work Attitudes Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2001; 4(3): 247 - 262. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Knippenberg, D. Articles by Hogg, M. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?