This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Postmes, T. Articles by de Wit, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Communication and Commitment in Organizations: A Social Identity Approach

University of Amsterdam, T.Postmes{at}exeter.ac.uk

Martin Tanis

University of Amsterdam

Boudewijn de Wit

University of Amsterdam

Results of two studies show that horizontal communications (informal, with proximate colleagues, of socio-emotional content) are less strongly related to levels of commitment at both organizational and unit level, than are vertical communications (strategic information and communication with management). In addition, it was shown that vertical communication from senior management predicts organizational commitment best, whereas commitment with the unit is predicted better by vertical communication at that level. Results are inconsistent with approaches to commitment in organizations and teams that assume commitment stems from interpersonal relations, but more consistent with approaches to organizational commitment based on a social identity approach which tend to focus on social-level antecedents of commitment and identification.

Key Words: communication • identification • organizational commitment • social identity

References

• Albert, S. (1998). The definition and meta-definition of identity. In D. A. Whetten & P. A. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 1-13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1988). Links between work experiences and organizational commitment during the first year of employment: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 195-209.
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.[ISI]
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252-276.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
• Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232-244.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP statistical software.
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Buchanan, B. I. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-546.[CrossRef]
• Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457-475.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• De Gilder, D., Van den Heuvel, H., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Het 3-componenten model van commitment. Gedrag en Organisatie, 10, 95-105.
• Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.[CrossRef]
• Downs, C. W., & Adrian, A. (1997). Communication audits. Lawrence, KS: Communication Management, Inc.
• Ellemers, N. (2000). Betrokkenheid bij het werk: Een kwestie van verstand of gevoel? [Inaugural lecture]. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
• Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Fontenot, J. C., & Scott, C. R. (2000). Correlates of organizational identification moderated by measurement scale, organizational type, and publication date: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 50th Annual Convention of the ICA, Acapulco, Mexico, June.
• Foy, N. (1994). Empowering people at work. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
• Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Harley, B. (1999). The myth of empowerment: Work organisation, hierarchy and employee autonomy in contemporary Australian workplaces. Work Employment and Society, 13, 41-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
• Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33, 499-517.[CrossRef]
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1972). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
• Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 191-228). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Larson, E., & Fukami, C. V. (1984). Relationships between worker behavior and commitment to the organization and union. Academy of Management Proceedings, 34, 222-226.
• Lawler, E. E., III, Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1995). Creating high performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and total quality management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Leavitt, H. J. (1972). Managerial psychology: An introduction to individuals, pairs, and groups in organizations (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. J. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-309.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Mael, F. A., & Tetrick, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813-824.[Abstract]
• Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 626-658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? Side-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715.[Abstract]
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1999). Social identity, group norms, and ‘deindividuation’: Lessons from computer-mediated communication for social influence in the group. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 164-183). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Postmes, T., Tanis, M., & De Wit, B. (2000). A meta-analysis of communication and organizational commitment: The coldest message elicits the warmest feelings. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
• Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Randall, D. M. (1990). The consequences of organizational commitment: Methodological investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 361-378.
• Randall, D. M., Fedor, D. B., & Longenecker, C. O. (1990). The behavioral expression of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 210-224.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10, 465-476.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 143-150.[CrossRef]
• Smidts, A., van Riel, C. B. M., & Pruyn, A. T. H. (2000). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Smith, V. (1997). New forms of work organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 315-339.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Somers, M. J., & Casal, J. C. (1994). Organizational commitment and whistle-blowing. Group & Organization Management, 19, 270-284.[Abstract]
• Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale. Paris: Larousse.
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27-60). London: Academic Press.
• Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-293.[ISI]
• Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In U. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2000). Further explorations of the organizational identification concept: Identification versus commitment: Manuscript submitted for publication.
• van Knippenberg, D., & Van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.[CrossRef]
• Warhurst, C., & Thompson, P. (1998). Hands, hearts, and minds: Changing work and workers at the end of the century. In C. Warhurst & P. Thompson (Eds.), The future workplace. London: Macmillan.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. E. Madlock The Link Between Leadership Style, Communicator Competence, and Employee Satisfaction Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 61 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Postmes, T. Articles by de Wit, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?