|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 5, No. 1,
5-18 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430202005001535
© 2002 SAGE Publications
Shared Information, Cognitive Load, and Group Memory
R. Scott Tindale
Loyola University Chicago, rtindal{at}luc.edu
Susan Sheffey
Jewish Vocational Services
One of the key findings concerning how groups process information is the common knowledge effectinformation shared by many group members plays a larger role in group process and performance than unshared information. However, in an information rich environment, assigning all information to all members may overload each members cognitive capabilities. Thus, the question addressed here is how to optimally assign information to group members. Following a model proposed by Zajonc and Smoke (1959), we assessed the effects of information assignment redundancy and group interaction on group memory performance. Participants in five-person groups either received a full list of consonant-verb-consonant non-word trigrams to memorize, or a partial list with each trigram distributed to two group members. Groups recalled the trigrams as either coacting or interacting groups. In terms of correct recall, coacting groups outperformed interacting groups, and partial redundancy produced better recall than total redundancy. However, intrusion errors were greatly reduced by group interaction and/or a reduction in the cognitive load on the individual group members (i.e. partial redundancy). Groups in the partial redundancy condition tended to perform near optimal levels. Implications for future research on information distribution in groups are discussed.
Key Words: group memory group performance information sharing
References
- Adams, J. A. (1980). Learning and memory. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
- Archer, J. E. (1960). A re-evaluation of the meaningfulness of all possible CVC trigrams. Psychological Monographs, 74, Whole No. 479.
- Argote, L., Devadas R., & Melone, N. (1990). The base rate fallacy: Contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 296-310.[CrossRef]
- Clark, N. K., & Stephenson, G. M. (1989). Group remembering. In P. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 357-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.[CrossRef]
- Davis, J. H. (1980). Group decision and procedural justice. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 157-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Davis, J. H. (1982). Social interaction as a combinatorial process. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 27-58). London: Academic Press.
- Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.[CrossRef]
- Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Harkins, S., & Jackson, M. J. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457-465.[Abstract]
- Helmreich, R. L. (1997). Managing human error in aviation. Scientific American, 276, 62-67.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hinsz, V. B. (1991). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718.
- Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conception of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hoppe, R. A. (1962). Memorizing by individuals and groups: A test of the pooling-of-ability model. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 64-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., & Kramer, G. P. (1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 687-719.[CrossRef]
- Kerr, N. L., Niedermeier, K. E., & Kaplan, M. F. (2000). On the virtues of assuming minimal differences in information processing in individuals and groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 203-217.
- Larson, J. R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
- Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating effects of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.[Abstract]
- Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. (1955). Two models of group behavior in the solution of Eureka-type problems. Psychometrika, 20, 139-148.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. (1962). Group and individual behavior in free-recall verbal learning. In J. H. Criswell, H. Solomon, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in small group processes (pp. 221-231). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Morrissette, J. O., Crannell, C. W., & Switzer, S. A. (1964). Group performance under various conditions of work load and informational redundancy. Journal of General Psychology, 71, 337-347.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-23.
- Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Perlmutter, H. V. (1953). Group memory of meaningful material. Journal of Psychology, 35, 361-370.
- Smith, C. M., Tindale, R. S., & Steiner, L. (1998). Investment decisions by individual and groups in Sunk Cost situations: The potential impact of shared representations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 175-189.
- Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem vs. making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
- Tindale, R. S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals and groups. In N. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 109-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Tindale, R. S., & Davis, J. H. (1983). Group decision making and jury verdicts. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. F. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 9-38). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000). Social sharedness as a unifying theme for information processing in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 123-140.
- Tindale, R. S., Meisenhelder, H. M., Dykema-Engblade, A. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Shared cognitions in small groups. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook in social psychology: Group processes (pp. 1-30). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Tindale, R. S., Sheffey, S., & Scott, L. A. (1993). Framing and group decision-making: Do cognitive changes parallel preference changes?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 470-485.[CrossRef]
- Vollrath, D. A., Sheppard, B. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Memory performance by decision-making groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 289-300.[CrossRef]
- Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Whyte, G. (1993). Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 430-455.[CrossRef]
- Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), Whats social about social cognition (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.
- Yuker, H. F. (1955). Group atmosphere and memory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 17-23.
- Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Social psychology: An experimental approach. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Zajonc, R. B., & Smoke, W. H. (1959). Redundancy in task assignments and group performance. Psychometrika, 24, 361-369.[CrossRef]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Stewart, C. B. Stewart, and J. Walden
Self-Reference Effect and the Group-Reference Effect in the Recall of Shared and Unshared Information in Nominal Groups and Interacting Groups
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
July 1, 2007;
10(3):
323 - 339.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|