Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lalonde, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Aleem, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 5, No. 1, 83-102 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430202005001808
© 2002 SAGE Publications

Representations and Preferences of Responses to Housing and Employment Discrimination

Richard N. Lalonde

York University, Toronto, Canada, lalonde{at}yorku.ca

Mirella L. Stroink

York University, Toronto, Canada

Muhammad R. Aleem

York University, Toronto, Canada

In two studies, the behavioral preferences of majority (White) and visible minority (non-White) individuals in response to a hypothetical situation of discrimination were examined. In addition, the characteristics and dimensions perceived to relate to these behaviors were also examined. In the first study, 120 primarily White undergraduate students first rated the likelihood of engaging in each of 14 behaviors in response to a situation of discrimination, and then rated each behavior on a number of attributes representing key dimensions of behavior identified in intergroup theories (individual-collective; active-passive; non-normative-normative) and phenomenological studies on the experience of discrimination (e.g. risk). A multimode factor analysis of the behaviors and attributes provided a three-component solution. While the dimensions underlying these components reflected dimensions of behavior identified by intergroup theorists, they were also qualitatively different from them. Further analysis revealed that behaviors associated with higher preference ratings were perceived as more normative, preparatory, and low in cost and risk. The behavioral preferences, and the dimensions underlying these preferences were replicated in a second study, which comprised 70 Black and South Asian participants. The patterns of results were similar for the White and non-White participants, although these two groups did differ in their endorsement and ratings of some of the behaviors.

Key Words: discrimination • intergroup relations • stigma

References

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Bingham, S. G., & Scherer, L. L. (1993). Factors associated with responses to sexual harassment and satisfaction with outcome. Sex Roles, 29, 239-269.[CrossRef]
  • Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Responding to a negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697-729.[CrossRef]
  • Boatswain, S. J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2000). Social identity and preferred ethnic/racial labels for Blacks in Canada. Journal of Black Psychology, 26, 216-234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Crocker, J., Voekl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 60-70.
  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Dion, K. L. (1986). Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 159-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dion, K. L., & Earn, B. M. (1975). The phenomenology of being a target of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 944-950.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dion, K. L., & Kawakami, K. (1996). Ethnicity and perceived discrimination in Toronto: Another look at the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 28, 203-213.
  • Essed, P. (1991a). Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Essed, P. (1991b). Knowledge and resistance: Black women talk about racism in the Netherlands and the USA. Feminism and Psychology, 1, 201-219.
  • Feagin, J. R. (1991). The continuing significance of race: Antiblack discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review, 56, 101-116.[CrossRef]
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Shullman, S. L. (1993). Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 5-27.
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn’t she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117-138.
  • Forgas, J. P. (1979). Social episodes: The study of interaction routines. New York: Academic Press.
  • Goldstein, S. B. (1999) Construction and validation of a Conflict Communication Scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1803-1832.[CrossRef]
  • Gruber, J. E. (1989). How women handle sexual harassment: A literature review. Sociology and Social Research, 74, 3-7.
  • Gruber, J. E., & Bjorn, L. (1986). Women’s responses to sexual harassment: An analysis of sociocultural, organizational, and personal resource models. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 814-826.
  • Gruber, J. E., & Smith, M. D. (1995). Women’s responses to sexual harassment: A multivariate analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 543-562.[CrossRef]
  • Gutek, B. A., & Koss, M. P. (1993). Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 28-48.[CrossRef]
  • Henry, F. (1989). Housing and racial discrimination in Canada: A preliminary assessment of current initiatives and information. Ottawa: Policy & Research, Multiculturalism & Citizenship.
  • Henry, F., & Ginzberg, E. (1985). Who gets the work? A test of racial discrimination. Toronto: Urban Alliance on Race Relations & Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. New York: Routledge.
  • Inman, M. L., & Baron, R. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 727-739.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jones, T. S., & Remland, M. S. (1992). Sources of variability in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 27, 121-142.
  • Kaiser, C. R, & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kardiner, A., & Oversey, L. (1951). The mark of oppression. New York: Norton.
  • Kawakami, K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). The impact of salient self-identities on relative depreciation and action intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 525-540.
  • Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 59-83). New York: Wiley.
  • Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Klandermans, B. (1989). Grievance interpretation and success expectations: The social construction of protest. Social Behavior, 4, 113-125.
  • Kroonenberg, P. M., & Brouwer, P. (1985). User’s guide to TUCKALS3. Leiden, The Netherlands: University of Leiden.
  • Lalonde, R. N., & Cameron, J. E. (1994). Behavioral responses to discrimination: A focus on action. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 257-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lalonde, R. N., Majumder, S., & Parris, R. D. (1995). Preferred responses to situations of housing and employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1105-1119.[CrossRef]
  • Lalonde, R. N., & Silverman, R. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78-85.[CrossRef]
  • Louis, W. R. (2001). Grumbling, voting, demonstrating, and rioting: A model of social identity and decision-making in intergroup contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
  • Louis, W. R., & Taylor, D. M. (1999). From passive acceptance to social disruption: Towards an understanding of behavioral responses to discrimination. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 31, 19-28.
  • Lykes, M. B. (1983). Discrimination and coping in the lives of Black women: Analyses of oral history data. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 79-100.
  • Major, B., Quinton, W. J., McCoy, S. K., & Schmader, T. (2000). Reducing prejudice: The target’s perspective. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 211-237). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Miller, C. T. & Kaiser, C. R. (2001) A theoretical perspective on coping with stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 73-92.[CrossRef]
  • Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Pettigrew, T. (1997). The future of social psychology: Strong hopes and weak predictions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Australasian Social Psychologists, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  • Pittam, J., Gallois, C., Iwawaki, S., & Kroonenberg, P. (1995). Australian and Japanese concepts of expressive behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 451-473.[Abstract]
  • Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 2-14.
  • Ruggiero, K. M., & Taylor, D. M. (1995). Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 826-838.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C., & Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 646-658.[CrossRef]
  • Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Taylor, D. M., Wright, S., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal-group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254-262.[Abstract]
  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Weiss, D., & Lalonde, R. N. (2001). Responses of female undergraduates to sexual harassment by male professors or teaching assistants. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 33, 148-163.
  • Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 15-30.
  • Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.[CrossRef]
  • Yoder, J. D., & Aniakudo, P. (1995). The responses of African American women firefighters to gender harassment at work. Sex Roles, 32, 125-137.[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lalonde, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Aleem, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?