Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sargis, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 5, No. 4, 333-347 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430202005004005

Informational Centrality and Member Participation During Group Decision Making

Edward G. Sargis

University of Illinois at Chicago, esargis{at}uic.edu

James R. Larson, Jr.

University of Illinois at Chicago

This study examined whether participation during group decision-making discussions is affected by the degree to which members hold predominantly shared versus predominantly unshared decision-relevant information. Altogether, 115 three-person, same-sex groups completed a decision-making task in which a majority of the information held by a randomly selected target member either was also held by other members of the group (shared information) or was held by the target member alone (unshared information). It was found that in comparison to target members who held mostly shared information, targets who held only unshared information claimed fewer speaking turns and contributed fewer information-based comments during discussion. Further, holding unshared information appeared to depress participation to a greater extent than holding shared information facilitated participation, relative to a standard of equal participation across all members. These participation effects subsequently influenced target members’ agreement with their group’s eventual decision, with lower participation resulting in lower agreement. Thus, in addition to the negative consequences that unequally distributed information can have for the group as a whole, the present findings highlight a parallel set of negative consequences that can exist for individual members of the group.

Key Words: group processes • information centrality • information sampling • participation

References

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In B. R. Burleson & A. W. Kunkel (Eds.), Communication Yearbook 20 (pp. 227-261). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539.[CrossRef]
  • Dachler, H. P., & Wilpert, B. (1978). Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation: A critical review. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 1-39.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. G. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
  • Festinger, L. A. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 114-140.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Goldberg, L. (1998). International personality item pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality and other individual differences. [Web Page] http://ipip.ori.org/ipip.
  • Gouran, D. S., Hirokawa, R. Y., Julian, K. M., & Leatham, G. B. (1993). The evolution and current status of the functional perspective on communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 16 (pp. 573-600). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718.[CrossRef]
  • Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y., & Takezawa, M. (1997). Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 296-309.
  • Kaplan, M. F. (1987). The influencing process in group decision making. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 189-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Kelly, J. R., & Karau, S. J. (1999). Group decision making: The effects of initial preferences and time pressure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1342-1354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60-84.
  • Larson, J. R., Jr., Christensen, C., Abbott, A. S., & Franz, T. M. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 315-330.
  • Larson, J. R., Jr., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Franz, T. M. (1998). Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 482-495.[Abstract]
  • Larson, J. R., Jr., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). The discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Larson, J. R., Jr., Sargis, E. G., Elstein, A. S., & Schwartz, A. (2002). Holding shared versus unshared information: Its impact on perceived member influence in decision-making groups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 145-155.[CrossRef]
  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1, 5-42.[Free Full Text]
  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
  • Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767-780.[CrossRef]
  • Parker, K. C. H. (1988). Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context-sensitive event sequence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 965-971.[CrossRef]
  • Parks, C. D., & Cowlin, R. A. (1996). Acceptance of uncommon information into group discussion when that information is or is not demonstrable. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 307-316.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 48-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 49-70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three-and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Stewart, D., & Stasser, D. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
  • Vroom, V. H. (1969). Industrial social psychology. In G. Lindsy & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 196-268). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Wittenbaum, G. W., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.[CrossRef][ISI]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Human Resource Development ReviewHome page
M. London
Antecedents and Consequences of Self-Verification: Implications for Individual and Group Development
Human Resource Development Review, September 1, 2003; 2(3): 273 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sargis, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?