Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 6, No. 3, 227-237 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/13684302030063001
© 2003 SAGE Publications

Derogating the Victim: The Interpersonal Consequences of Blaming Events on Discrimination

Cheryl R. Kaiser

University of California at Santa Barbara, c_kaiser{at}psych.ucsb.edu

Carol T. Miller

University of Vermont

This experiment examines whether African Americans who attribute negative events to discrimination incur interpersonal costs, such as being viewed as troublemakers. An African American job candidate who attributed a rejection to discrimination was perceived as more of a troublemaker (e.g. hypersensitive, irritating) than an African American who attributed rejection either to his interviewing skills or to job competition. This devaluation occurred even when discrimination was blatant, such as when the employer made old-fashioned racist statements (e.g. `Black people are just not as smart as White people'). This suggests that members of stigmatized groups may be reluctant to publicly acknowledge being the target of discrimination because it is socially costly to do so.

Key Words: attribution • discrimination • impression formation • prejudice • stigma

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1978). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
  • Carlston, D. E., & Shovar, N. (1983). Effects of performance attributions on others' perceptions of the attributor . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 515-525 .[CrossRef]
  • Clark, R., Anderson, N. B., Clark, V. R., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Racism as a stressor for African Americans: A biopsychosocial model . American Psychologist, 54, 805-816 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 504-553). Boston: McGraw Hill .
  • Crosby, F. J. (1993). Why complain? Journal of Social Issues, 49, 169-184 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18 .
  • Devine, P.G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R, & Elliot, A. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817-830 .[CrossRef]
  • Fazio, R. H., Chen, J., McDonel, E. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of objective-evaluation association . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339-357 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1978). On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence . Journal of Personality, 46, 228-243 .[CrossRef]
  • Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 161-202.). New York: Academic Press .
  • Feagin, J. R., & Sikes, M. P. (1994). Living with racism: The Black middle-class experience. Boston: Beacon Press .
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women's responses to sexual harassment . Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117-138 .
  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). New York: Academic Press .
  • Goldman, B. M. (2001). Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing . Personnel Psychology, 54, 361-387 .
  • Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61-139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
  • Haslett, B. B., & Lipman, S. (1997). Micro inequalities: Up close and personal. In N. V. Benokraitis (Ed.), Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change (pp. 34-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining!: The social costs of making attributions to discrimination . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences . Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179-196 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lalonde, R, N., & Cameron, J. E. (1994). Behavioral responses to discrimination: A focus on action. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 257-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Latting, J. K. (1993). Soliciting individual change in an interpersonal setting: The case of racially or sexually offensive language . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 464-484 .[Abstract]
  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press .
  • Mendes, W. B., Blascovich, J., Lickel, B., & Hunter, S. (2002). Challenge and threat during social interactions with White and Black men . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 939-952 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Near, J. P., & Jensen, T. C. (1983). The whistleblowing process: Retaliation and perceived effectiveness . Work and Occupations, 10, 3-28 .[Abstract]
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2002). Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization . Group Dynamics, 6, 3-16 .[CrossRef]
  • Schlenker, B. R., Pantari, B. A., & Christopher, A. N. (2001). Excuses and character: Personal and social implications of excuses . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 15-32 .
  • Sechrist, G. B., & Stangor, C. (2001). Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 645-654 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Shelton, J. N. (2003). Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
  • Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality . Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23-35 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Van Allen, K. L., & Sechrist, G. B. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,82, 69-74 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you say?!: Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., & Porter, L. E. (1994). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7., pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. M. Garcia, A. H. Reser, R. B. Amo, S. Redersdorff, and N. R. Branscombe
Perceivers' Responses to In-Group and Out-Group Members Who Blame a Negative Outcome on Discrimination
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2005; 31(6): 769 - 780.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?