Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hegarty, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lemieux, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 7, No. 2, 119-130 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430204041399
© 2004 SAGE Publications

Heterosexist Ambivalence and Heterocentric Norms: Drinking in Intergroup Discomfort

Peter Hegarty

University of Surrey

Felicia Pratto

Anthony F. Lemieux

University of Connecticut

Eighty two participants read about either a gay male target who felt discomfort in a straight bar or a straight male target who felt discomfort in a gay bar. Participants explained the discomfort, rated the target’s actions, and produced counterfactuals that ‘undid’ his discomfort. Explanations of the targets’ discomfort focused on gayness more than on straightness, suggesting that they were affected by heterocentric norms. The straight target’s expressions of discomfort were perceived as more appropriate than the gay target’s, particularly among participants with strong anti-gay attitudes. Counterfactuals which undid these events also suggested implicit inequities in the perceived norms for interactions between gay and straight persons. These results are explained in terms of ambivalence between support for egalitarianism and anti-gay affect and the continued operation of heterocentric norms that limit the degree to which egalitarianism translates into equal treatment of persons of all sexual orientations.

Key Words: ambivalence • counterfactuals • explanations • heteronormativity • heterosexism

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley .
  • Branscombe, N. R., Owen, S., Garstka, T. A., & Coleman, J. (1996). Rape and accidental counterfactuals: Who might have done otherwise and would it have changed the outcome? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1042–1067 .[CrossRef]
  • Branscombe, N. R., & Weir, J. A. (1992). Resistance as stereotype-inconsistency: Consequences for judgments of rape victims . Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 80–102 .
  • Bricknell, C. (2000). Heroes and invaders: Gay and lesbian pride parades and the public/private distinction in New Zealand media accounts . Gender, Place, and Culture, 7, 163–178 .
  • Dynes, W. R., & Donaldson, S. (Eds.). (1992). Homosexuality, religion, and philosophy. New York: Garland .
  • Gannon, L., Luchetta, T., Rhodes, K., Pardie, L., & Segrist, D. (1992). Sex bias in psychological research: Progress or complacency? American Psychologist, 47, 389–396 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512 .[CrossRef]
  • Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. (2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 723–735 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Herek, G. M. (1984). Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A factor analytic study . Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 39–51 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications. Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay issues, Vol. 1, pp. 206–228. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Herek, G. M. (1996). Why tell if you’re not asked? Self-disclosure, intergroup contact, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. In G. M. Herek, J. B. Jobe, & R. M. Carney (Eds.), Out in force: Sexual orientation and the military (pp. 197–225). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
  • Herek, G. M. (1999). The psychology of sexual prejudice . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22 .
  • Herek, G. M, & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). ‘Some of my best friends’: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians . Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424 .
  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives . Psychological Review, 93, 136–153 .[CrossRef]
  • Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Katz, I., & Hass, G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905 .[CrossRef]
  • Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecendents and consequences . Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179–196 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement and the distribution of family labor . Journal of Social Issues, 49, 141–159 .
  • Mandel, D. R., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Counterfactual thinking and ascriptions of cause and preventability . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 450–463 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Martyna, W. (1980). Beyond the ‘he/man’ approach: The case for nonsexist language . Signs, 5, 482–493 .[CrossRef]
  • McCloy, R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2000). Counterfactual thinking about controllable events . Memory and Cognition, 28, 1071–1078 .[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • McMullen, M. N., Markman, K. D., & Gavanski, I. (1995). Living in neither the best nor the worst of all possible worlds: Antecedents and consequences of upward and downward counterfactual thinking. In N.J. Roese & J.M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 133–167). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Miller, D., & Prentice, D. A. (1996). The construction of social norms and standards. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 799–829). New York: Guildford .
  • Miller, D., Taylor, B., & Buck, M. L. (1991). Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 5–12 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Moreno, K. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2001). Intergroup affect and social judgment: Feelings as inadmissible information . Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 21–29 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • N’gbala, A., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Mental simulation and causal attribution: When simulating an event does not affect fault assignment . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 139–162 .[CrossRef]
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp, (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 93–114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Phelan, S. (2001). Sexual strangers: Gays, lesbians, and dilemmas of citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press .
  • Pratto, F., & Walker, A. (2001). Dominance in disguise: Power, beneficence, and exploitationin personal relationships. In A. Lee-Chai and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 93–114). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis .
  • Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (Eds). (1999). Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
  • Richardson, D., & May, H. (1999). Deserving victims? Sexual status and the socialconstruction of violence . Sociological Review, 47, 308–331 .[CrossRef]
  • Roese, N. (1997). Counterfactual thinking . Psychological Bulletin, 121, 131–148 .
  • Roese, N., & Hur, T. (1997). Affective determinants of counterfactual thinking . Social Cognition, 15, 274–290 .
  • Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., & Krysan, M. (1997). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Van Allen, K. L., & Sechrist, G. B. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 69–74 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Swim, J. K., Aiken, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. (1999). Excuse me, what did you just say?! Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Tropp, L., Stout, A. M., Wright, S. C., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2002). Salience of group membership in cross-group interactions: Minority and majority perspectives. Unpublished manuscript, Boston College, Boston, MA.
  • Valentine, G. (1993). (Hetero)sexing space: Lesbian perceptions and experiences of everyday spaces . Environment and Planning D; Society and Space, 11, 395–413 .[CrossRef]
  • Waldo, C. R. (1999). Working in a majority context: A structural model of heterosexism as minority stress in the workplace . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 218–232 .[CrossRef]
  • Warner, M. (1999). The trouble with normal: Sex, politics and the ethics of queer life. New York: Free Press .
  • Woodzicka, J. A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment . Journal of Social Issues, 57, 15–30 .
  • Yang, A. S. (1999). From rights to wrongs: Public opinion of gay and lesbian Americans moves toward equality. Washington, DC: National Lesbian and Gay Task Force .
  • Yang, A. S. (2001). The 2000 national election study and gay and lesbian rights: Support for equality grows. Washington, DC: National Lesbian and Gay Task Force .

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hegarty, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lemieux, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?