Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nistad, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lodewijkx, H. F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 7, No. 3, 195-206 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430204046107
© 2004 SAGE Publications

Persistence in Brainstorming: Exploring Stop Rules in Same-Sex Groups

Bernard A. Nistad

Annelies E. M. van Vianen

University of Amsterdam

Wolfgang Stroebe

Hein F. M. Lodewijkx

Utrecht University

In a laboratory experiment, three-person interactive and three-person nominal groups of college students brainstormed without externally imposed time constraints. All groups were homogeneous with regard to gender. Half of the participants were instructed to continue brainstorming until they ran out of ideas (expectancy stop rule), whereas the other half were instructed to continue until they were satisfied with their performance (satisfaction stop rule). We found that interactive groups were more persistent than nominal groups in both of the stop rule conditions and thereby compensated for their usual productivity loss. We also found, as predicted, that women were more persistent in the satisfaction stop rule condition, whereas men were more persistent in the expectancy stop rule condition. This effect may be due to gender differences in self-evaluations.

Key Words: brainstorming • gender differences • persistence • stop rules

References

  • Aries. E. (1998). Gender differences in interaction: A reexamination. In D. J. Canary & K Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in Communication: Critical essays and empirical inveestigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 65-81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Bergman, M. M., & Scott. J. (2001). Young adolescents' wellbeing and health-risk behaviors: Gender and socio-economic differences . Journal of Adolescence, 24 183-197 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Betsworth, D. G. (1999). Accuracy of self-estimated abilities and the relationship between selfestimated abilities and realism for women . Journal of Career Assessment. 7 35-43 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Camacho, L. M.. & Paulus. P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 1071-1080 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Costa, P., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 322-331 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Cross, S. E. (2001). Training the scientists and engineers of tomorrow: A person-situation approach . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31 296-323 .[CrossRef]
  • Deaux, K, & Lafrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2. pp. 788-827). Boston: McGraw-Hill .
  • Dennis. A. R., & Valacich J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one . Jouarnal of Applied Psychology, 78 531-537 .[CrossRef]
  • Diehl. M., & Stroebe. W. (1987). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Toward the solution of a riddle . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53. 497-509 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Diehl. M.. & Stroebe. W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect . Journal of Peisonality and Social Psychology, 61 392-403 .[CrossRef]
  • Dugosh, K L., Paulus, P. B.. Roland, E. J.. & Yang, H. C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 722-735 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hoyenga, K B., & Hoyenga, K T. (1993). Genderrelated differences: Origins and outcomes Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
  • Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women . Psychology of Women Quarterly. 21 387-393 .[CrossRef]
  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations . Jornnal of Applied Psychology, 83 17-34 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kimball. M. M., & Gray, V. A. (1982). Feedback and performance expectancies in an academic setting . Sex Roles, 8 999-1024 .[CrossRef]
  • Kling, K C., Hyde. J. S.. Showers. C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 125 470-500 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Levine J. M.. & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research . Annual Review of pychology 41, 585-634 .
  • Lynn. R., & Martin, T. (1997). Gender differences in extraversion. neuroticism. and psychoticism in 37 nations . Journal of Social Psychology. 137 369-373 .
  • Martin. L. L., Ward, D. W.. Achee, J. W.. & Wyer. R. S., Jr. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their mood . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64 317-326 .[CrossRef]
  • Martin, T., & Kirkcaldy, B. (1998). Gender differences on the EPQ-R and attitudes to work . Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 1-5 .[CrossRef]
  • Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration . Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12 3-24 .
  • Nijstad. B. A.. Stroebe, WV., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (1999). Persistence of brainstorming groups: How do people know when to stop? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35 165-185 .[CrossRef]
  • Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38. 535-544 .[CrossRef]
  • Osborn. A. F. (1957). Applied imagination New York: Scribner .
  • Parnes, S. J.. & Meadow. A. (1959). Effects of 'brainistorming' instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects . Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 171-176 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet. M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 575-586 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of productivity . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 19 78-89 .[Abstract]
  • Paulus. P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting . Basic and Applied Social Psvchology, 17 249-265 .[CrossRef]
  • Paulus. P. B.. &Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations . Oiganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 82 76-87 .
  • Postmes. T.. & Spears. R. (2002). Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Pschology Bulletin. 28 1073-1083 .
  • Steiner. I. D. (1972). Group process and prodntictivity New York: Academic Press .
  • Stroebe, W.. & Diehl. M. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 271-303). London: Wiley .
  • Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1992). The illusion of group effectivity . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 643-650 .[Abstract]
  • Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context . Administrative Science Quarterly 41. 685-718 .[CrossRef]
  • Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when brain-storming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3 23-47 .[CrossRef]
  • Vroom. V. (1964). Work and motivation New York: Wiley .

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nistad, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lodewijkx, H. F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?