|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 7, No. 4,
305-315 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430204046140
© 2004 SAGE Publications
Hunting for a Job: How Individual Differences in Foraging Strategies Influence the Length of Unemployment
Grazyna Wieczorkowska
University of Warsaw, gw{at}uw.edu.pl
Eugene Burnstein
University of Michigan
A model of individual difference in foraging is used to predict the speed with which unemployed Poles gain employment. Foraging theory assumes an evolved computational mechanism that produces a trade-off between search costs, the amount of preparation individuals foresee as required to achieve an outcome, and whether they deem the outcome worth pursuing. We argue that the expression of this mechanism varies over individuals (as well as situations, the traditional focus of foraging theory) and distinguish between two ideal-type foraging strategies based on the nature of the trade-off. One, called a point strategy, denotes individuals who are willing to incur significant search costs. They characteristically engage in meticulous planning and consider only a few options as worth pursing. The other, called an interval strategy, describes individuals who are typically averse to incurring search costs. They plan in a perfunctory manner and are willing to accept many options as ‘good enough’. Two hypotheses are tested: (i) Interval strategists find jobs more rapidly than point strategists. (ii) Women, because they incur greater search costs, find jobs less rapidly than men. In addition, we conjectured if women’s search costs are sufficiently greater, they may benefit more than men by adopting an interval strategy. Two studies, the first with a convenience sample and the second with a representative national sample, provide strong support for the first hypothesis, reasonable support for the second, and weaker support for our conjecture. A third study demonstrates that in evaluating the attractiveness of a job individuals weigh its features in a fashion consistent with their foraging strategy.
Key Words: foraging strategies • individual differences • Poland • unemployment
References
- Apter, M. (1989). Reversal theory: Motivation, emotion, and personality. London: Routlege .
- Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.). (1958). Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand .
- Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
- Frederickson, J. W., & Michel, T. R. (1984). Strategic decision processes: comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment . Academy of Management Journal, 27, 445-466 .[CrossRef][ISI]
- Hill, K., & Hawkes, K. (1983). Neotropical hunting among the Ache of Eastern Paraguay. In R. Hames & W. Vickers (Eds.), Adaptive responses of native Amazonians (pp. 223-267). New York: Academic Press .
- Kaplan, H., & Hill, K. (1992). The evolutionary ecology of food acquisition. In E. A. Smith & B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology and human behaviour (pp. 167-202). New York: Aldine .
- Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (Eds.). (1997). Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach (3rd edn). Oxford: Blackwell .
- McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand .
- Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). The measurement and correlates of category width as a cognitive variable . Journal of Personality, 26, 532-544 .[CrossRef]
- Sahlins, M. D. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine Atherton .
- Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (3rd edn). New York: Free Press .
- Simpson, J. A., & Kenrick, D. T. (Eds.). (1997). Evolutionary social psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
- Wang, X. T. (1996a). Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violation of utility axioms and social contexts . Cognition, 60, 31-63 .[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wang, X. T. (1996b). Evolutionary hypotheses of risk-sensitive choice: Age differences and perspective change . Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 1-15 .
- Wang, X. T. (1996c). Framing: Dynamics and task domains . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 145-157 .[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wang, X. T. (2002). Kith-and-kin rationality in risky choices: Theoretical modeling and cross-cultural empirical testing. In F. K. Salter (Ed.), Risky transactions: Trust, kinship, and ethnicity. New York: Berghahn Books .
- Wieczorkowska, G., & Burnstein, E. (1999). The role of search costs and screening strategies in social change: Adapting to the transition from socialism to capitalism in Poland . Psychological Science, 10, 98-105 .[CrossRef]
- Wieczorkowska, G. & Burnstein, E. (2000). Monitoring adaptation to social change: In J. A. Bargh & D. K. Apsley (Eds.), Unraveling the complexities of social life. Washington, DC: APA .
- Wieczorkowska, G., & Burnstein, E. (2002). The adaptive value of interval goal-setting strategies during social change in Poland. In M. Klonowicz & G. Wieczorkowska (Eds.), Social change: Adaptation and resistance. Warsaw: Institute of Social Studies Press .
- Wieczorkowska-Nejtardt, G. (1998). Inteligencja motywacyjna: skuteczne strategie wyboru celu i sposobu dzialania.[Motivational intelligence: efficacious strategies for choosing goals and ways of action]. Warsaw: WISS .
- Wieczorkowska-Siarkiewicz, G. (1992). Punktowe i przedzialowe reprezentacje celu: Uwarunkowania i konsekwencje[Point and interval goal representations: Determinants and consequences]. Warsaw: University of Warsaw Press .
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
