Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miron, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 9, No. 2, 163-180 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206062075

Collective Guilt as Distress over Illegitimate Intergroup Inequality

Anca M. Miron

Nyla R. Branscombe

University of Kansas

Michael T. Schmitt

Simon Fraser University

We examine how appraisals of the legitimacy of gender inequality affect men's experience of collective guilt. We tested two potential routes by which perceiving intergroup inequality as legitimate might undermine collective guilt: via reductions in empathy for the disadvantaged outgroup or via reductions in the distress experienced when confronted with the suffering of the outgroup. In the first study (N= 52), we measured legitimacy appraisals, and in the second experimental study (N= 73) we manipulated the legitimacy of gender inequality. In both studies, reductions in self-focused distress mediated the effect of legitimacy appraisals on collective guilt, while other-oriented empathy did not. These effects suggest that collective guilt is a self-focused emotion that emerges when members of a dominant group perceive their relationship with a disadvantaged outgroup to be illegitimate.

Key Words: collective guilt • distress • empathy • legitimacy of inequality

References

  • Austin, W., Walster, E., & Utne, M. K. (1976). Equity and the law: The effect of a harmdoer's ‘suffering in the act’ on liking and assigned punishment. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 9, pp. 163–190). New York: Academic Press .
  • Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control . Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27–46 .
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C, Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Bar-Tal, D. (1989). Delegitimization: The extreme case of stereotyping and prejudice. In D. Bar-Tal, C. F. Graumann, A. W. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions (pp. 169–182). New York: Springer-Verlag .
  • Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 65–121 .
  • Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Batson, C. D., Duncan, B., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 290–302 .[CrossRef]
  • Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758 .[Abstract]
  • Batson C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences . Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L. et al. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
  • Branscombe, N. R. (1998). Thinking about one's gender group's privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men . British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167–184 .
  • Branscombe, N. R. (2004). A social psychological process perspective on collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives(pp. 320–334). New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2004). Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups(pp. 49–66). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press .
  • Branscombe, N. R., Slugoski, B., & Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives(pp. 16–34). New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development . Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Estrada-Hollenbach, M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1998). Avoiding and alleviating guilt through prosocial behavior. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 215–231). San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
  • Ferguson, T. J., & Stegge, H. (1998). Measuring guilt in children: A rose by any other name still has thorns. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 19–74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
  • Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57, 212–228 .[CrossRef]
  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon .
  • Hoffman, M. L. (1987). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Empathy and its development (pp. 47–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Hoffman, M. L. (1991). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 281–313). New York: Academic Press .
  • Hoffman, M. L. (1998). Varieties of empathy-based guilt. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 91–112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
  • Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129 .[Abstract]
  • Lazarus, R. C. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press .
  • Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). ‘Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate’: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration(pp. 136–163). New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 9, pp. 133–162). New York: Academic Press .
  • Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer reactions to the ‘innocent victim’: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mallett, R. K., & Swim, J. K. (2004). Collective guilt in the United States: Predicting support for social policies that alleviate social injustice. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives(pp. 56–74). New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged . Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344 .
  • Piliavin, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Clark, R. D., III. (1981). Emergency intervention. New York: Academic Press .
  • Powell, A. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2005). Inequality as ‘ingroup privilege’ or ‘outgroup disadvantage’: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 501–521 .
  • Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions. A structural theory . Review of Personality and Social Personality, 5, 11–35 .
  • Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206–221 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Schmitt, M., Behner, R., Montada, L., Muller, L., & Muller-Fohrbrodt, G. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and education as privileges: Exploring the generalizability of the existential guilt reaction . Social Justice Research, 13, 313–337 .[CrossRef]
  • Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). Determinants of the intensity of gender-based guilt in men. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives(pp. 75–92). New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Schmitt, M. T., Ellemers, N., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination in organizations. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice(pp. 277–292). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press .
  • Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisals in emotion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Smith, E. R. (1999). Affective and cognitive implications of a group becoming part of the self: New models of prejudice and of the self-concept. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition(pp. 183–196). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
  • Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations . Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729–743 .[CrossRef]
  • Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103–118 .[CrossRef]
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
  • Tangney, J. P. (1991). Moral affect: The good, the bad, and the ugly . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598–607 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 115–139). New York: Guilford .
  • Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. M. (1976). New directions in equity research. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 9, pp. 1–42). New York: Academic Press .
  • Weber, U., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2002). Perceived legitimacy of intergroup status differences: Its prediction by relative ingroup prototypicality . European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 449–470 .[CrossRef]
  • Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)–emotion action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help giving . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186–200 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 738–748 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life(pp. 20–50). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. T. Schmitt, D. A. Miller, N. R. Branscombe, and J. W. Brehm
The Difficulty of Making Reparations Affects the Intensity of Collective Guilt
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2008; 11(3): 267 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
R. K. Mallett and J. K. Swim
The Influence of Inequality, Responsibility and Justifiability on Reports of Group-Based Guilt for Ingroup Privilege
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, January 1, 2007; 10(1): 57 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miron, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?