Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fielding, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Annandale, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 9, No. 2, 199-218 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206062077

Reactions to Positive Deviance: Social Identity and Attribution Dimensions

Kelly S. Fielding

Michael A. Hogg

Nicole Annandale

The University of Queensland

This research examines whether evaluations of positive deviates (i.e. high achieving group members) are influenced by the attributions they make for their performance. We argue that ingroup positive deviates who make group attributions help enhance the ingroup's image and thus attract favorable evaluations. In Experiment 1, ingroup positive deviates who made group attributions were generally evaluated more favorably than ingroup positive deviates who made individual attributions. There was also evidence that the positive deviates' attribution style influenced group and self-evaluations. Evaluations of outgroup positive deviates were not influenced by their attribution style. In Experiment 2, an ingroup positive deviate who was successful and attributed that success to the group was upgraded relative to an ingroup positive deviate who made individual attributions. Group evaluations were also higher when the positive deviate made group attributions. This pattern did not emerge when the positive deviate failed. The results are discussed from a social identity perspective.

Key Words: attribution • positive deviance • social identity

References

  • Abrams, D., Marques, J., Bown, N., & Dougill, M. (2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics . Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 163–182 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906–912 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bond, M. H., Chiu, C., & Wan, K. (1984). When modesty fails: The social impact of group-effacing attributions following success or failure . European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 335–338 .
  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior . Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219–243 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Brewer, M. B., & Weber, J. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparisons . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268–275 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication . Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30–48 .[Abstract]
  • Cialdini, R., Borden, R., Thorne, A., Walker, M., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375 .[CrossRef]
  • Cialdini, R. B., & De Nicholas, M. E. (1989). Self-presentation by association . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 626–631 .[CrossRef]
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Richardson, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of image management: Basking and blasting . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406–415 .[CrossRef]
  • Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations . Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51–69 .[CrossRef]
  • Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642–655 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Feather, N. T. (1989). The fall of the high achiever: Research into attitudes toward the tall poppy. In J. P. Forgas & J. M. Innes (Eds.), Recent advances in social psychology: An international perspective (pp. 7–20). Amsterdam: Elsevier .
  • Feather, N. T. (1993). The rise and fall of political leaders: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect . Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 61–68 .
  • Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes towards high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 1–73 .
  • Feather, N. T., Volkmer, R. E., & McKee, I. R. (1991). Attitudes towards high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect . Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 85–91 .
  • Fielding, K. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1997). Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 39–51 .[CrossRef]
  • Forsyth, D. R., Berger, R. E., & Mitchell, T. (1981). The effects of self-serving vs. other-serving claims of responsibility on attraction and attribution in groups . Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 59–64 .[CrossRef]
  • Forsyth, D. R., & Mitchell, T. (1979). Reactions to others' egocentric claims of responsibility . Journal of Psychology, 103, 281–285 .
  • Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1995). Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness . British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 139–160 .
  • Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, L., & Ely, P. G. (1998). Social identity and aspects of social creativity: Shifting to new dimensions of intergroup comparison. In S. Worchel, J. F. Morales, D. Páez, & J.-C. Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives(pp. 166–179). London: Sage .
  • Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions . European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85–111 .
  • Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200
  • Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462–479). New York: Guilford .
  • Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge .
  • Hogg, M. A., Cooper-Shaw, L., & Holzworth, D. W. (1993). Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 452–465 .[Abstract]
  • Hogg, M. A., Fielding, K. S., & Darley, J. (2005). Fringe dwellers: Processes of deviance and marginalization in groups. In D. Abrams, J. Marques, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social psychology of inclusion and exclusion.(pp. 191–210). New York: Psychology Press .
  • Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295–309 .[CrossRef]
  • Hogg, M. A., & Hardie, E. A. (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175–180 .
  • Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., Harnish, R., & Hodge, C. N. (1996). Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 241–254 .[CrossRef]
  • Jones, E. E., & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research(Vol. 1, pp. 389–420). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
  • Jussim, L., Coleman, L. M., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536–546 .[CrossRef]
  • Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91–103 .[CrossRef]
  • Major, B., Sciacchitano, A. M., & Crocker, J. (1993). In-group versus out-group comparisons and self-esteem . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 711–721 .[Abstract]
  • Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Páez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976–988 .[CrossRef]
  • Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & SerÙdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436–447 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Marques, J. M., & Páez, D. (1994). The ‘black sheep effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability . European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68 .
  • Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived in-group and out-group homogeneity . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 341–348 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Schmitt, M. T., Silvia, P. J., & Branscombe, N. R. (2000). The intersection of self-evaluation maintenance and social identity theories: Intragroup judgment in interpersonal and intergroup contexts . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1598–1606 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Segal, M. W. (1979). Varieties of interpersonal attraction and their interrelationships in natural groups . Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 253–261 .[CrossRef]
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
  • Taylor, D. M., Doria, J. R., & Tyler, J. K. (1983). Group performance and cohesiveness: An attribution analysis . Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 187–198 .
  • Taylor, D. M., & Tyler, J. K. (1986). Group members' responses to group-serving attributions for success and failure . Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 775–781 .
  • Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 181–227). New York: Academic Press .
  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations(pp. 15–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
  • Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1990). Die-hard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification and BIRGing and CORFing tendencies . Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14, 103–117 .

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fielding, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Annandale, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?