Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Langer, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 9, No. 3, 339-358 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206064638
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Horizontal Hostility: Multiple Minority Groups and Differentiation from the Mainstream

Judith B. White

Michael T. Schmitt

Dartmouth College

Ellen J. Langer

Harvard University

Three studies examined minority group members' attitudes toward other, similar minority groups. We predicted that minority group members would differentiate between multiple outgroups with asymmetric horizontal hostility(White & Langer, 1999), a pattern of expressing relatively unfavorable attitudes toward an outgroup that is similar to and more mainstream than the minority ingroup. We replicated White and Langer's pattern of horizontal hostility among members of minority political parties in Greece (Study 1). When the mainstream majority was made a salient part of the intergroup context, vegetarians' attitudes toward vegans became more positive, and vegans' attitudes toward vegetarians more negative (Study 2). In Study 3, mainstream salience made Dartmouth College students' relative evaluations of a similar, more mainstream college more negative, whereas priming a superordinate minority identity made them more positive. Results suggest that asymmetric horizontal hostility results from the motivation to differentiate one's minority ingroup from a similar, more mainstream group in comparative contexts anchored by the mainstream majority outgroup.

Key Words: intergroup relations • minority identity

References

  • Abrams, D., Marques, J., Bown, N., & Dougill, M. (2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics . Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 163–182 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley
  • Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers & R. Spears (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content(pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd.
  • Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity . Social Cognition, 11, 150–164 .
  • Brewer, M. B., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. New York: Sage .
  • Brewer, M. B., Manzi, J. M., & Shaw, J. S. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status . Psychological Science, 4, 88–92 .[CrossRef]
  • Brown, R. (1984). The role of similarity in intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 603–623). London: Cambridge University Press .
  • Brown, R., & Abrams, D. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78–92 .[CrossRef]
  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press .
  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma . Psychological Review, 96, 608–630 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Diehl, M. (1988). Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discrimination . British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 289–300 .
  • Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. A. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change . British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233–246 .
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity . International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271–290 .
  • Grant, P. R. (1993). Reactions to intergroup similarity: Examination of the similarity–differentiation and the similarity–attraction hypotheses . Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25, 28–44 .
  • Gunther, R., & Montero, J. R. (2001). The anchors of partisanship: A comparative analysis of voting behavior in four Southern European democracies. In P. N. Diamandouros & R. Gunther (Eds.), Parties, politics, and democracy in the new Southern Europe(pp. 83–137). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press .
  • Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self-categorization and accentuation . European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 251–277 .
  • Hogg, M. A., Hardie, E. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (1995). Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness . European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 159–177 .
  • Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2003). Not being what you claim to be: Imposters as sources of group threat . European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 639–657 .[CrossRef]
  • Huddy, L., & Virtanen, S. (1995). Subgroup differentiation and subgroup bias among Latinos as a function of familiarity and positive distinctiveness . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 97–108 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Spears, R. (2001). Rebels with a cause: Group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204–1213 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Distinctiveness threat and prototypicality: Combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem . European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 635–657 .[CrossRef]
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Defining dimensions of distinctiveness: Group variability makes a difference to differentiation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1481–1492 .[CrossRef]
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2001). Similarity as a source of differentiation: The role of group identification . European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 621–640 .[CrossRef]
  • Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & McKinnie, B. M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 130–140 .[Abstract]
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Ingroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A metaanalytic integration . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862–879 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kidder, L. H., & Stewart, V. M. (1975). The psychology of intergroup relations: Conflict and consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill .
  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–331 .[Abstract]
  • Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The ‘black sheep effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37–68). Chichester: Wiley .
  • Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The ‘Black sheep effect’: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification . European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16 .
  • Marques, J., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976–988 .[CrossRef]
  • McGuire, W. J., & Padawer-Singer, A. (1976). Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 743–754 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mohr, J. J., & Rochlen, A. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353–369 .[CrossRef]
  • Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research . Psychological Bulletin, 108, 499–514 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). Influence of long-term racial environmental composition on subjective well-being in African Americans . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 735–751 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Povey, R., Wellens, B., & Conner, M. (2001). Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: An examination of the role of ambivalence . Appetite, 37, 15–26 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (1996). Self-category constructions in political rhetoric: An analysis of Thatcher's and Kinnock's speeches concerning the British miners' strike (1984–5) . European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 353–371 .[CrossRef]
  • Roccas, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (1993). Effects of intergroup similarity on intergroup relations . European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 581–595 .
  • Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology(Vol. 12, pp. 167–199). Chichester: Wiley .
  • Schmitt, M. T., Spears, R., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Constructing a minority group identity out of shared rejection: The case of international students . European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–12 .
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press .
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). The social psychology of minorities. London: Minority Rights Group .
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worschel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brook Cole .
  • Turner, J. C. (1978). Social comparison, similarity and ingroup-favouritism. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in social psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 235–250). London: Academic Press .
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell .
  • Vegetarian Resource Group. (August 30, 2000). How many vegetarians are there? Retrieved June 14, 2003, from http://vrg.org/journal/vj97sep/979poll.htm.
  • Wagner, K. (2005). Winner loses title in disability pageant: Newspaper photo showed her standing Retrieved April 4, 2005 from http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/local/11290643.htm.
  • Walster, E., & Walster, B. (1963). Effect of expecting to be liked on choice of associates . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 402–404 .[CrossRef]
  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Watson, P. (1994). Ocean warrior: My battle to end the illegal slaughter on the high seas. Toronto, ON: Key Porter .
  • White, J. B., & Langer, E. J. (1999). Horizontal hostility: Relations between similar minority groups . Journal of Social Issues, 55, 537–559 .[CrossRef]
  • Widdicombe, S., & Wooffitt, R. (1990). ‘Being’ versus ‘doing’ punk: On achieving authenticity as a member . Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 257–277 .[Abstract]
  • Wilder, D. A., & Thompson, J. E. (1988). Assimilation and contrast effects in the judgments of groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 62–73 .[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Langer, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?