This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hobman, E. V. Articles by Bordia, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Role of Team Identification in the Dissimilarity-Conflict Relationship

University of Queensland, liz{at}psy.uq.edu.au

Prashant Bordia

University of South Australia

This study examined the role of team identification in the dissimilarity and conflict relationship. We tested competing predictions that team identification would either mediate or moderate the positive associations between visible (age, gender and ethnic background), professional (background) and value dissimilarity and task and relationship conflict. Data was collected from 27 MBA student teams twice during a semester. Multilevel modelling and a longitudinal design were used. Results showed that value dissimilarity was positively associated with task and relationship conflict at Time 2. Its effects on relationship conflict at Time 1 were moderated by team identification. Team identification also moderated the effects of gender, age and ethnic dissimilarity on task conflict at Time 2, and the effects of gender and professional dissimilarity on relationship conflict at Time 2. No support was obtained for the mediating role of team identification on the associations between dissimilarity and conflict, or for changes in the effects of dissimilarity over time.

Key Words: conflict • dissimilarity • identification

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage .
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley .
• Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams . Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance . International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239-253 .[ISI]
• Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1997). Categorization, recategorization, and common ingroup identity. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 236-256). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
• Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
• Arnold, C. L. (1992). Methods, plainly speaking. An introduction to hierarchical linear models . Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 58-90 .
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization . Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovation in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124 .
• Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams . Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802-836 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Bateman, T. S., & Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment . Academy of Management Journal, 27, 95-112 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Baugh, S. G., & Graen, G. B. (1997). Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross-functional teams . Group & Organization Management, 22, 366-383 .[Abstract]
• Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science .
• Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal group situation: A cognitive motivational analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Brickson, S. (2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings . Academy of Management Review, 25, 82-101 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization . Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286 .
• Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
• Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press .
• Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes . Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749-749 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior . Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273-287 .
• Chattopadhyay, P. (2003). Can dissimilarity lead to positive outcomes? The influence of open versus closed minds . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 295-312 .[CrossRef]
• Chattopadhyay, P., & George, E. (2001). Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory . Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 781-788 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Chattopadhyay, P., George, E., & Lawrence, S. A. (2004). Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction . Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 892-900 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Chattopadhyay, P., Tluchowska, M., & George, E. (2004). Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity . Academy of Management Review, 29, 180-202 .[ISI]
• Edison, M., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L. S., & Terenzini, P. T. (1996). Influences on students’ openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college . Journal of Higher Education, 67, 174-195 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity . European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum estimation for missing data in structural equation models . Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430-457 .[CrossRef]
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes . Human Relations, 7, 117-140 .[CrossRef]
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model . European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1-26 .
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity . International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271-290 .
• Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Gaertner, S., Mann, J., Dovidio, J., Murrell, A., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692-704 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Gelfand, M. J., Kuhn, K. M., & Radhakrishnan, P. (1996). The effect of value differences on social interaction processes and job outcomes: Implications for managing diversity. In M. N. Ruderman, M. W. Hughes-James, & S. E. Jackson (Eds.), Selected research on work team diversity (pp. 53-71). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association .
• Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press .
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion . Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107 .
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams and task performance: A longitudinal study of the changing effects of diversity on group functioning . Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045 .[ISI]
• Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. (2003). Consequences of feeling dissimilar from others in a work team . Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 301-325 .[CrossRef]
• Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. (2004). Perceived dissimilarity and work group involvement . Group and Organization Management, 29, 560-587 .
• Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
• Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions . European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111 .
• Hogg, M. A., & Hardie, E. A. (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175-180 .
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts . Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Hogg, M. A., & Williams, K. D. (2000). From I to We: Social identity and the collective self . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 81-97 .[CrossRef]
• Jackson, S., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover . Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley .
• Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantage and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict . International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238 .
• Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict . Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance . Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 703-729 .[CrossRef]
• Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes . International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287-305 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups . Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. (2004). The impact of demographic heterogeneity and team leader-team member demographic fit on team empowerment and effectiveness . Group & Organization Management, 29, 334-368 .[Abstract]
• Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 191-228). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
• Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage .
• Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes . Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 424-432 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1015-1039 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control in groups and organizations . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 175-210 .
• Newman, D. A. (2003). Longitudinal modeling with randomly and systematically missing data: A simulation of ad hoc, maximum likelihood, and multiple imputation techniques . Organizational Research Methods, 6, 328-362 .[Abstract]
• Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., Ruekert, R. W., & Bonner, J. M. (2001). Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance . Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 259-271 .
• O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover . Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37 .
• O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit . Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Pelled, L. H. (1996a). Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation . International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 230-246 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Pelled, L. H. (1996b). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory . Organization Science, 7, 615-631 .[CrossRef]
• Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance . Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28 .
• Pelled, L. H., Xin, K. R., & Weiss, A. M. (2001). No es como mi: Relational demography and conflict in a Mexican production facility . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 63-84 .
• Randel, A. E. (2002). Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 749-766 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2004). A user’s guide to MLwiN (version 2.1f). London: Institute of Education, University of London .
• Riordan, C. M., & Shore, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units . Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 342-358 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Riordan, C. M., & Weatherly, E. W. (1999). Defining and measuring employees’ identification with their work groups . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 310-324 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press .
• Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779-802 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one’s prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 510-517 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Schneider, B. (1983). An interactionist perspective on organizational effectiveness. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1-31). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
• Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus . Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51-71 .
• Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making . Academy of Management Journal, 32, 745-772 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2000). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage .
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins Publishers .
• Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 77-98). London: Academic Press .
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
• Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance . Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 217-241 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Thomas, D. C. (1999). Cultural diversity and work group effectiveness. An experimental study . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 242-263 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment . Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
• Turner, J. C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tafjel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 518-538). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
• Van der Vegt, G. S. (2002). Effects of attitude dissimilarity and time on social integration: A longitudinal panel study . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 439-452 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification . Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532-547 .[ISI]
• Van der Vegt, G. S., & Van der Vliert, E. (2005). Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams . Journal of Management, 31, 73-89 .[Abstract]
• Van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification . Academy of Management Journal, 46, 715-727 .[ISI]
• Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda . Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research . Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140 .

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hobman, E. V. Articles by Bordia, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?